These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10649517)
1. Liquid-based cervical-cell collection with brushes and wooden spatulas: a comparison of 100 conventional smears from high-risk women to liquid-fixed cytocentrifuge slides, demonstrating a cost-effective, alternative monolayer slide preparation method. Johnson T; Maksem JA; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Klock LA; Eatwell L Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 10649517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manual method for liquid-based cytology: a demonstration using 1,000 gynecological cytologies collected directly to vial and prepared by a smear-slide technique. Maksem JA; Finnemore M; Belsheim BL; Roose EB; Makkapati SR; Eatwell L; Weidmann J Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Nov; 25(5):334-8. PubMed ID: 11747227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the CytoRich monolayer preparation system for cervical cytology. A prelude to automated primary screening. Takahashi M; Naito M Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 9390142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resolving ASCUS without recourse to HPV testing: manual reprocessing of residual automated liquid-based cytology (ALBC) material using manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC). Maksem JA; Bedrossian CW; Kurtycz D; Sewall S; Shalkham J; Dhanwada V; Lind H; Bibbo M; Weidmann J; Kane B; Shi Fu Y Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):434-40. PubMed ID: 16299747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation. Longatto Filho A; Pereira SM; Di Loreto C; Utagawa ML; Makabe S; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Castelo A Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):497-500. PubMed ID: 15863150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Endocervical cell collection using cytobrush, liquid-fixation, and cytocentrifugation: A feasibility study using 455 hysterectomy specimens. Maksem JA Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Dec; 21(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 10572276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the CytoRich technique for cervical smears. Stevens MW; Nespolon WW; Milne AJ; Rowland R Diagn Cytopathol; 1998 Mar; 18(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 9523146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology. Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases. Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results. Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology. Howell LP; Davis RL; Belk TI; Agdigos R; Lowe J Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology. Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of monolayer preparations for cervical cytology: emphasis on suboptimal specimens. Vassilakos P; Cossali D; Albe X; Alonso L; Hohener R; Puget E Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(3):496-500. PubMed ID: 8669185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site. Bishop JW Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations. Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]