These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10649927)

  • 21. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
    Attar N; Korkmaz Y
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Francci CE; Perdigão J
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study.
    Mohan B; Kandaswamy D
    Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):511-21. PubMed ID: 15997932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding.
    Meiers JC; Kresin JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 8957905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Munro GA; Hilton TJ; Hermesch CB
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 9484173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Nechad S; Tavernier B; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 11949792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: a comparison.
    Barnes DM; McDonald NJ; Thompson VP; Blank LW; Shires PJ
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 9028232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dentin adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):240-4. PubMed ID: 1299247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Delme KI; Deman PJ; De Moor RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of Compoglass-F and Dyract-AP compomers in Class V preparations after salivary contamination.
    Evancusky JW; Meiers JC
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10730285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.