These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10650017)

  • 21. Diagnosing lung cancer earlier in the UK.
    Hubbard RB; Baldwin DR
    Thorax; 2010 Sep; 65(9):756-8. PubMed ID: 20805161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening for lung cancer: challenges for the thoracic surgeon.
    Stiles BM; Altorki NK
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2011 Oct; 20(4):619-35. PubMed ID: 21986261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Implementing image-guided radiotherapy in the UK: plans for a co-ordinated UK research and development strategy.
    Price P; Heap G
    Br J Radiol; 2008 May; 81(965):379-82. PubMed ID: 18440941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality assurance and the assurance of quality in the management of cancers detected in breast cancer screening: the role of BASO.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Dec; 16(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 2253801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Screening for cervical cancer: revised policy. The recommendations of the DHSS Committee on Gynaecological Cytology.
    Draper GJ
    Health Trends; 1982 May; 14(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 10258580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Means of improving the organization of surgical care of lung cancer patients].
    Shulutko ML; Vinner MG; Motus IIa; Golod VN; Chaĭkovskiĭ GN
    Vopr Onkol; 1987; 33(7):79-83. PubMed ID: 2956768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Screening and mortality from cervical cancer. Study shows importance of centralised organisation in screening.
    Adab R; McGhee S; Hedley A
    BMJ; 1999 Sep; 319(7210):642-3. PubMed ID: 10523097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosing lung cancer earlier in the UK.
    Weir M; Anderson WJ; Murtagh E; Donnelly R; Leggett J; Wieboldt J
    Thorax; 2011 Apr; 66(4):356; author reply 356-7. PubMed ID: 21081484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Size isn't important; the Forrest Unit.
    Beck NE; Sampson M; Michell R; Rainsbury RM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1994 Dec; 20(6):635-6. PubMed ID: 7995412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer screening policy.
    Elwood M
    N Z Med J; 1998 Sep; 111(1074):370. PubMed ID: 11039826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Seamark CJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Oct; 48(435):1704. PubMed ID: 10071414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computerisation of screening for cervical cancer. The OCCURS Group.
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1988 May; 46(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 3182253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Disputable and unsolved aspects of mass screening].
    Krivoruchko ZA; Rafaliuk NIa; Shuster LA
    Sov Zdravookhr; 1991; (8):48-51. PubMed ID: 1962240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 'Controversy'. Propaganda versus evidence based health promotion: the case of breast screening.
    Hann A
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 1999; 14(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 11184917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Current issues in lung cancer screening.
    Mulshine JL
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2005 Nov; 19(13):1724-30; discussion 1730-1. PubMed ID: 16425524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prostate cancer. It couldn't happen here.
    Bryan J
    Health Serv J; 1998 Nov; 108(5632):suppl 4-6. PubMed ID: 10187640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Screening for early detection of cancer.
    Ebeling K; Nischan P
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1990; 60(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 2202271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Information requirements for cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Draper GJ
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):171-83. PubMed ID: 3570403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer.
    Chamberlain J
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):161-8. PubMed ID: 3570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical screening: the potential contribution of workplace examinations.
    Morris GJ
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1988 May; 46(3):156-9. PubMed ID: 3182255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.