These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1065047)

  • 1. Dental definition and Grievance or review commities.
    Tex Dent J; 1975 Jun; 93(6):28, 30. PubMed ID: 1065047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter: The legal definition of oral surgery.
    Baumgarten RS
    J Oral Surg; 1976 Feb; 34(2):104. PubMed ID: 1060733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decade of dental litigation. Disciplinary proceedings: Part three.
    Morris WO
    J Law Ethics Dent; 1988; 1(3):143-58. PubMed ID: 3078333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dispute resolution for the dental profession.
    Trachte EW
    J Gt Houst Dent Soc; 1993 Nov; 65(4):8, 10-11. PubMed ID: 9584719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Legislation about continuing education in the field of dental surgery].
    Zahnarztl Mitt; 1972 Dec; 62(24):1207-8. PubMed ID: 4510174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting peer review actions to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners.
    Young MG
    Tex Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2922688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review in Texas. A survey of medical staffs.
    Ross K
    Tex Med; 1987 Mar; 83(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 3576497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral surgery panel discussion February 5, 1977.
    J Dist Columbia Dent Soc; 1977; ():60-6, 68-73. PubMed ID: 267091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consumers gain voice in Ontario dentistry.
    Dent Surv; 1976 Feb; 52(2):98. PubMed ID: 1076238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter: Legislation--the solution to a dilemma.
    Pleasants JE
    J Oral Surg; 1974 Mar; 32(3):166. PubMed ID: 4521378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peer review process.
    Crawford FC
    Tex Dent J; 1988 Sep; 105(9):5. PubMed ID: 3217901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Workshop discussion..
    Ariz Dent J; 1976; 22(3):13-9, 51-3. PubMed ID: 1067062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resolving the doctor's dilemma.
    Dent Manage; 1977 Aug; 17(8):42. PubMed ID: 271091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial. The best teaching.
    Hayward JR
    J Oral Surg; 1971 Mar; 29(3):165. PubMed ID: 5278862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research using human subjects: conference summary.
    Jenny J
    J Dent Educ; 1980 Jun; 44(6):338-40. PubMed ID: 6929310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review update--new tools and requirements.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1987 Sep; 83(9 Pt 1):87-9. PubMed ID: 3672399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter: Complication conference as an education mechanism.
    Marco W; Nemarich A; Goldberg M
    J Oral Surg; 1974 May; 32(5):327. PubMed ID: 4524271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Putting "peer" into PRO.
    Carroll RP
    Tex Med; 1989 Jun; 85(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 2660318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentistry's emerging role-workshop summary.
    Ill Dent J; 1971 Oct; 40(10):634-7. PubMed ID: 5287195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The current prescription possibilities of dental surgeons].
    Perret M
    Ann Odontostomatol (Lyon); 1966; 23(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 5938442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.