466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10652167)
21. Vision screening in children with developmental delay can be improved: analysis of a screening programme outside the ophthalmic clinic.
Nielsen LS; Skov L; Jensen H
Dev Med Child Neurol; 2007 Jul; 49(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 17593122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for amblyopia risk factors in pre-verbal children using the Plusoptix photoscreener: a cross-sectional population-based study.
Moghaddam AA; Kargozar A; Zarei-Ghanavati M; Najjaran M; Nozari V; Shakeri MT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 21515564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Amblyopia detection by camera: Gateway to portable, inexpensive vision screening (calibration and validation of inexpensive, pocket-sized photoscreeners).
Arnold RW; Arnold AW; Stark L; Arnold KK; Leman R; Armitage MD
Alaska Med; 2004; 46(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 15839597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity of photoscreening to detect high-magnitude amblyogenic factors.
Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Ottar W; Scott WE
J AAPOS; 2002 Apr; 6(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 11997804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preverbal photoscreening for amblyogenic factors and outcomes in amblyopia treatment: early objective screening and visual acuities.
Kirk VG; Clausen MM; Armitage MD; Arnold RW
Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 126(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 18413517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation and cost-effectiveness of a home-based screening system for amblyopia.
Lan W; Zhao F; Li Z; Zeng J; Liu W; Lu J; Zheng D; Lin L; Ge J; Yang Z
Ophthalmology; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 22365057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-based refinement of referral criteria for photoscreening.
Donahue SP; Johnson TM
Ophthalmology; 2001 Dec; 108(12):2309-14; discussion 2314-5. PubMed ID: 11733276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Seoul Metropolitan Preschool Vision Screening Programme: results from South Korea.
Lim HT; Yu YS; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim S; Lee M; Jeong JY; Shin KH; Koo BS
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):929-33. PubMed ID: 15205240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The yield and challenges of charitable state-wide photoscreening.
Arnold RW; Donahue SP
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2006; 21(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 16792524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.
Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS;
Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of monocular autorefraction to comprehensive eye examinations in preschool-aged and younger children.
Kemper AR; Keating LM; Jackson JL; Levin EM
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 May; 159(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 15867116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The cost and yield of photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic costs.
Arnold RW; Armitage MD; Gionet EG; Balinger A; Kovtoun TA; Machida C; Coon LJ
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2005; 42(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 15825747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners.
Matta NS; Arnold RW; Singman EL; Silbert DI
Arch Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 127(12):1591-5. PubMed ID: 20008713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive value of photoscreening and traditional screening of preschool children.
Salcido AA; Bradley J; Donahue SP
J AAPOS; 2005 Apr; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 15838437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for amblyogenic factors using a volunteer lay network and the MTI photoscreener. Initial results from 15,000 preschool children in a statewide effort.
Donahue SP; Johnson TM; Leonard-Martin TC
Ophthalmology; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1637-44; discussion 1645-6. PubMed ID: 10964820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of the Lang II stereotest in screening for binocular disorders in 6-year-old children.
Huynh SC; Ojaimi E; Robaei D; Rose K; Mitchell P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 140(6):1130-2. PubMed ID: 16376664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of preschool vision screening methods in a population with a high prevalence of astigmatism.
Miller JM; Dobson V; Harvey EM; Sherrill DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):917-24. PubMed ID: 11274067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of photoscreening techniques for amblyogenic factors in children.
Kennedy RA; Sheps SB
Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Oct; 24(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 2692792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can photoscreening effectively detect amblyogenic risk factors in children with neurodevelopmental disability?
Neena R; Gopan A; Nasheetha A; Giridhar A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 70(1):228-232. PubMed ID: 34937243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of computer-photoscreening with non-cycloplegic retinoscopy for amblyopiogenic risk factors in children.
Guo X; Jia X; Guo L; Xiao X; Shen H; Li S; Zhang Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2000 Nov; 113(11):1007-10. PubMed ID: 11776113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
