BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10653506)

  • 1. When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains.
    Reynolds KJ; Turner JC; Haslam SA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 Jan; 78(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 10653506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intergroup bias.
    Hewstone M; Rubin M; Willis H
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2002; 53():575-604. PubMed ID: 11752497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: the positive-negative asymmetry effect and normative processes.
    Amiot CE; Bourhis RY
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2005 Jun; 44(Pt 2):289-308. PubMed ID: 16004650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination.
    Mullin BA; Hogg MA
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1998 Sep; 37 ( Pt 3)():345-65. PubMed ID: 9738312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiating in-group favoritism from shared reality in intergroup perception.
    Dimdins G; Montgomery H
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 15535810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of personal and collective self-esteem on strategies of social differentiation.
    Long KM; Spears R; Manstead AS
    Br J Soc Psychol; 1994 Sep; 33 ( Pt 3)():313-29. PubMed ID: 7953220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Minority versus majority: intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm].
    Yoshida F; Kubota K
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1994 Dec; 65(5):346-54. PubMed ID: 7884974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solidarity through shared disadvantage: Highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups.
    Cortland CI; Craig MA; Shapiro JR; Richeson JA; Neel R; Goldstein NJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Oct; 113(4):547-567. PubMed ID: 28581301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of information asymmetry and situational salience in reducing intergroup bias: the case of ultimatum games.
    Valenzuela A; Srivastava J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1671-83. PubMed ID: 22956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Being similar versus being equal: intergroup similarity moderates the influence of in-group norms on discrimination and prejudice.
    Gabarrot F; Falomir-Pichastor JM; Mugny G
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Jun; 48(Pt 2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18789182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of subjective group dynamics: children's judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals.
    Abrams D; Rutland A; Cameron L
    Child Dev; 2003; 74(6):1840-56. PubMed ID: 14669899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects.
    Jetten J; Spears R; Manstead AS
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Dec; 71(6):1222-33. PubMed ID: 8979388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting intergroup bias: the interactive effects of implicit theory and social identity.
    Hong YY; Coleman J; Chan G; Wong RY; Chiu CY; Hansen IG; Lee SL; Tong YY; Fu HY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1035-47. PubMed ID: 15257787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceivers' responses to in-group and out-group members who blame a negative outcome on discrimination.
    Garcia DM; Reser AH; Amo RB; Redersdorff S; Branscombe NR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jun; 31(6):769-80. PubMed ID: 15833904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking.
    Tarrant M; Calitri R; Weston D
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Sep; 23(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 22851441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mood and the correction of positive versus negative stereotypes.
    Lambert AJ; Khan SR; Lickel BA; Fricke K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1997 May; 72(5):1002-16. PubMed ID: 9150581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social identity in adolescence.
    Tarrant M; North AC; Edridge MD; Kirk LE; Smith EA; Turner RE
    J Adolesc; 2001 Oct; 24(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 11676507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two forms of intergroup discrimination with positive and negative outcomes: explaining the positive-negative asymmetry effect.
    Gardham K; Brown R
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2001 Mar; 40(Pt 1):23-34. PubMed ID: 11329832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond prejudice: are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?
    Dixon J; Levine M; Reicher S; Durrheim K
    Behav Brain Sci; 2012 Dec; 35(6):411-25. PubMed ID: 23164194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who believes us when we try to conceal our prejudices? The effectiveness of moral credentials with in-groups versus out-groups.
    Krumm AJ; Corning AF
    J Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 148(6):689-709. PubMed ID: 19058658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.