89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654033)
1. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10490744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of physical imaging properties among three kinds of imaging plates used in photostimulable phosphor systems for dental radiography.
Nishikawa K; Ooguro T; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2002 Feb; 43(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12013822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors.
Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between radiation dose reduction and image quality change in photostimulable phosphor luminescence X-ray imaging systems.
Sakurai T; Kawamata R; Kozai Y; Kaku Y; Nakamura K; Saito M; Wakao H; Kashima I
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 20395461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative image quality measurements of a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
Rofo; 2013 Dec; 185(12):1188-94. PubMed ID: 23888475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems.
Flynn MJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1612-23. PubMed ID: 10501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of the two-dimensional detective quantum efficiency of a computed radiography system.
Båth M; Håkansson M; Månsson LG
Med Phys; 2003 Dec; 30(12):3172-82. PubMed ID: 14713084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms.
Alpöz E; Soğur E; Baksi Akdeniz BG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 18033946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of two digital radiographic storage phosphor systems.
Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Paganini GA; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11210259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
