These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654033)

  • 21. Use of local noise power spectrum and wavelet analysis in quantitative image quality assurance for EPIDs.
    Lee S; Yan G; Bassett P; Gopal A; Samant S
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):4996. PubMed ID: 27587030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
    Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correction of background noise in direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshioka T; Kobayashi C; Suda H; Sasaki T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):256-62. PubMed ID: 9161179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography.
    Brettle DS; Workman A; Ellwood RP; Launders JH; Horner K; Davies RM
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Mar; 69(819):256-61. PubMed ID: 8800870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sci-Sat AM(1): Imaging-07: Open field normalization: How to avoid inflation to MTF and DQE values caused by zero-frequency normalization.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part3):3415. PubMed ID: 28512872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.
    Vedantham S; Karellas A; Suryanarayanan S; Levis I; Sayag M; Kleehammer R; Heidsieck R; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 10984230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.
    Båth M; Sund P; Månsson LG
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2286-97. PubMed ID: 12408303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 9780903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptibility curves for the Digora system.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Matsuo T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12917286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of a novel digital subtraction technique for detecting subtle changes in jawbone density.
    Du Tré F; Jacobs R; Styven S; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Sep; 10(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Precise image-receptor calibration and monitoring of beam quality with a step wedge.
    Couture RA; Hildebolt CF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 11803390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
    Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
    Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.