218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654036)
1. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography.
Besimo CE; Lambrecht JT; Guindy JS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10654036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study.
Vasak C; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Strbac G; Schemper M; Zechner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Oct; 22(10):1157-1163. PubMed ID: 21244498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points.
Widmann G; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Stoffner R; Longato S; Bale R; Puelacher W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1140-7. PubMed ID: 20156663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients.
Pettersson A; Komiyama A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):527-37. PubMed ID: 20491812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
Voitik AJ
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual variation simulation of CAD/CAM template-guided surgeries performed on human cadavers: Part II.
Kero T; Pettersson A; Fäldt J; Andersson M; Gillot L; Cannas B; Näsström K; Söderberg R
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jul; 104(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 20620367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flapless surgery and immediately loaded implants: a retrospective comparison between implantation with and without computer-assisted planned surgical stent.
Danza M; Carinci F
Stomatologija; 2010; 12(2):35-41. PubMed ID: 20679754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
