These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654037)

  • 21. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms.
    Collins J; Shah A; McCarthy C; Sandler J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 18068604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms.
    Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions.
    Ladeira DB; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 21180804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of horizontal magnification on panoramic images.
    Raoof M; Haghani J; Ebrahimi M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 24025873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A method to calculate angular disparities between object and receptor in "paralleling technique".
    Schulze RK; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 11803386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs.
    Wyatt DL; Farman AG; Orbell GM; Silveira AM; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 9161166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques.
    Lund H; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):379-86. PubMed ID: 19700531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy and details of the panoramic cross-sectional tomographic images: an in vitro study.
    Kumar MA; Mody B; Nair GK; Surender LR; Gopal SS; Prasad RV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 22430700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles.
    Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.
    Ladeira DB; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):417-21. PubMed ID: 22282504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring cortical thickness on panoramic radiographs: a validation study of the Mental Index.
    Dutra V; Susin C; da Costa NP; Veeck EB; Bahlis A; Fernandes Ada R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17656120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mathematical approach to horizontal and vertical magnification factors in rotational panoramic radiography--with attention to redundant shadows.
    Wakoh M; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1991 Aug; 32(3):87-94. PubMed ID: 1819448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of Image Compression on Linear Measurements of Digital Panoramic Radiographs.
    Provedel LF; Pimentel BN; Jesus TM; Lacerda AP; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(6):757-760. PubMed ID: 27982191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Successful dental implantation: evaluating the accuracy of horizontal and vertical measurements on panoramic radiographs using dental implants as reference objects.
    Coskun E; Kocak Topbas N
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2021 Dec; 70(6):269-275. PubMed ID: 33929136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of computational measurement of the condyles on digital panoramic radiographs.
    Momjian A; Courvoisier D; Kiliaridis S; Scolozzi P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Oct; 40(7):444-50. PubMed ID: 21960403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of digitalized panorama and cone beam computed tomographic image distortion for the diagnosis of dental implant surgery.
    Yim JH; Ryu DM; Lee BS; Kwon YD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):669-73. PubMed ID: 21415634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of on-screen measurements, magnification, and calibration in digital radiography.
    Read RL; Duncan CG; Wallace AD; Perry JA; Duerr FM
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2012 Sep; 241(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 22947163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Dove SB; Welander U; Tronje G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 8464620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.