These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654456)
1. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. Dearborn JT; Harris WH J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 10654456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. Dearborn JT; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years. Dearborn JT; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. Clohisy JC; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study. Clohisy JC; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-Term Follow-Up of Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using Jumbo Cups. Zhang J; Huang Y; Zhou B; Zhou Y Orthop Surg; 2019 Oct; 11(5):811-818. PubMed ID: 31549788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision of failed acetabular components with use of so-called jumbo noncemented components. A concise follow-up of a previous report. Hendricks KJ; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Mar; 88(3):559-63. PubMed ID: 16510823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after a previous acetabular reconstruction with use of a bulk femoral head graft in patients who had congenital dislocation or dysplasia. A follow-up note. Bal BS; Maurer T; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1703-6. PubMed ID: 10608381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup]. Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study. Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. Chen WM; Engh CA; Hopper RH; McAuley JP; Engh CA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Feb; 82(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 10682728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Harris-Galante cementless THA: a 19- to 25-year follow-up study. Saito S; Ishii T; Mori S; Hosaka K; Tokuhashi Y Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):12. PubMed ID: 21210625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acetabular Revision Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Deep Profile Jumbo Component: A Ten to Sixteen Year Follow-Up Study. McLaughlin JR; Lee KR J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):496-499. PubMed ID: 28993083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up. Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old. Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second-generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age. Kim YH; Oh SH; Kim JS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jan; 85(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 12533580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]