These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654468)

  • 1. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
    Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
    Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphological study of the newly designed cementless femoral stem.
    Baharuddin MY; Salleh ShH; Zulkifly AH; Lee MH; Mohd Noor A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():692328. PubMed ID: 25025068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph-can it predict the bone quality?
    Yeung Y; Chiu KY; Yau WP; Tang WM; Cheung WY; Ng TP
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jun; 21(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 16781402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal.
    Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Measurement of proximal femoral morphology and analysis of 500 cases in Hunan Province].
    Pi Y; Zhao Y; Wang W; He Z; Mao X
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Sep; 38(9):925-30. PubMed ID: 24071692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image processing for femoral endosteal anatomy detection: description and testing of a computed tomography based program.
    Laine HJ; Kontola K; Lehto MU; Pitkänen M; Jarske P; Lindholm TS
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):673-89. PubMed ID: 9127444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The reconstruction of three-dimension morphology of proximal femur].
    Wang W; Wang Y; Cui J; Han G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 41(10):744-8. PubMed ID: 14766046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people].
    Fuku H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 68(9):763-73. PubMed ID: 7963930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur.
    Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal anterior femoral flare and torsion. Anatomic bases for metaphyseally fixed short stems design.
    Sariali E; Knaffo Y
    Int Orthop; 2017 Oct; 41(10):2017-2023. PubMed ID: 28283706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of the False Acetabulum on Femoral Proximal Medullary Canal in Unilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dislocation of the Hip.
    Du Y; Li T; Sun J; Ni M; Zhou Y
    Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2020; 16():631-637. PubMed ID: 32753873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The internal calcar septum (femoral thigh spur) in computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Adam F; Hammer DS; Pape D; Kohn D
    Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Feb; 30(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 11310203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur.
    Massin P; Geais L; Astoin E; Simondi M; Lavaste F
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 10654469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The proximal femur--a second look at rational of implant design.
    Mishra AK; Chalise P; Singh RP; Shah RK
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2009 Dec; 11(4):278-80. PubMed ID: 20635610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The internal calcar septum and its contact with the virtual stem in THR: a computer tomographic evaluation.
    Decking J; Decking R; Schoellner C; Drees P; Eckardt A
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Oct; 74(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 14620973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements.
    Sen RK; Tripathy SK; Kumar R; Kumar A; Dhatt S; Dhillon MS; Nagi ON; Gulati M
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Aug; 18(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 20808010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal.
    Fessy MH; Bejui J; Fischer LP; Bouchet A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 1995; 17(2):155-60, 21-3. PubMed ID: 7482154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design].
    Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal.
    Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A
    Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.