221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654829)
1. Identifying and assessing the null hypothesis.
Luft HS
Health Serv Res; 2000 Feb; 34(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 10654829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Good study design and analysis plans as features of ethical research with humans.
Weinberg JM; Kleinman KP
IRB; 2003; 25(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 14870739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. How to design a clinical trial.
Curtis BM; Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS
Methods Mol Med; 2003; 86():475-89. PubMed ID: 12886789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Multilevel models in health outcomes research. Part II: statistical and analytic issues.
Lake ET
Appl Nurs Res; 2006 May; 19(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 16728298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjusting for bias in C/E ratio estimates.
Stinnett AA
Health Econ; 1996; 5(5):470-2. PubMed ID: 8922973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Challenging the validity of conclusions based on P-values alone: a critique of contemporary clinical research design and methods.
Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Dorey F; Sarmiento A
Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():587-600. PubMed ID: 9097190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of clinical trial results.
Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Fertil Steril; 2008 Nov; 90(5 Suppl):S114-20. PubMed ID: 19007606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Studying the prevention of acute kidney injury: lessons from an 18th-century mathematician.
Chertow GM; Palevsky PM; Greene T
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1124-7. PubMed ID: 17699335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Literature review: January-March 2008.
Patterson SD; Carroll K
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 18428118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical research 3: Sample selection.
Endacott R; Botti M
Accid Emerg Nurs; 2007 Oct; 15(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 17420129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What we want: qualitative research. Promising frontier for family medicine.
Reid AJ
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Mar; 42():387-9, 397-400. PubMed ID: 8616275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding research: 2. Ensuring reliability and validity.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Sep; 10(8):329-31. PubMed ID: 12964336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome assessment: suggestions for agency practice.
Mordock JB
Child Welfare; 2000; 79(6):689-710. PubMed ID: 11104154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ancient black art.
Koehnle TJ; Schank JC
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 19929115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size and the probability of a successful trial.
Chuang-Stein C
Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):305-9. PubMed ID: 17128428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism.
Holmes TH
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2004 Apr; 286(4):E495-501. PubMed ID: 15010353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice.
Khuder SA; Kahaleh B
J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Selected methodological issues in evaluating community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs.
Koepsell TD; Wagner EH; Cheadle AC; Patrick DL; Martin DC; Diehr PH; Perrin EB; Kristal AR; Allan-Andrilla CH; Dey LJ
Annu Rev Public Health; 1992; 13():31-57. PubMed ID: 1599591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When less is more: using shrinkage to increase accuracy.
Wears RL; Normand SL
Ann Emerg Med; 2010 Jun; 55(6):553-5. PubMed ID: 20494223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
