These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10654829)

  • 21. A model-averaging approach to replication: the case of p rep.
    Iverson GJ; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Jun; 15(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20515238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment.
    Greenland S
    Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):225-8. PubMed ID: 21871481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scale development.
    Dinero TE
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 10162907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variance estimation in clinical studies with interim sample size re-estimation.
    Miller F
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 16011681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seven reasons why you should not categorize continuous data.
    Dinero TE
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 10162905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The analysis of continuous outcomes in multi-centre trials with small centre sizes.
    Pickering RM; Weatherall M
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5445-56. PubMed ID: 17924360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The difficult and ubiquitous problems of multiplicities.
    Berry DA
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 17879328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Survey and research (12). Steps in the survey process: testing reliability of scales].
    Kawaguchi T
    Kango Kenkyu; 1997; 30(6):85-9. PubMed ID: 9543994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
    Pickler RH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.
    Jamieson S
    Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1217-8. PubMed ID: 15566531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.
    Halcomb EJ; Gholizadeh L; DiGiacomo M; Phillips J; Davidson PM
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1000-11. PubMed ID: 17518876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stationarity of health expenditures and GDP: evidence from panel unit root tests with heterogeneous structural breaks.
    Jewell T; Lee J; Tieslau M; Strazicich MC
    J Health Econ; 2003 Mar; 22(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 12606148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primer on interpreting surveys.
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(2):96-7. PubMed ID: 10915331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Show the data, don't conceal them.
    Drummond GB; Vowler SL
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):287-9. PubMed ID: 21535086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Common errors in the design of orthopaedic studies.
    Bono CM; Tornetta P
    Injury; 2006 Apr; 37(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16473355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing discordant voices: some notes on using Bayes's theorem in interpretive inquiry.
    Miller SI; Fredericks M
    Qual Health Res; 1998 May; 8(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 10558338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The 'goddess of randomisation' in small samples.
    Bangdiwala SI
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2011 Mar; 18(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 21409678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.