These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10655327)

  • 1. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
    Baetens P; Devroey P; Camus M; Van Steirteghem AC; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
    Laruelle C; Place I; Demeestere I; Englert Y; Delbaere A
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes towards gamete donation among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Oskarsson T; Dimitry ES; Mills MS; Hunt J; Winston RM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 2031893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Oocyte donation: parents's secrets and lies].
    Karpel L; Flis-Trèves M; Blanchet V; Olivennes F; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2005 Oct; 34(6):557-67. PubMed ID: 16208198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
    Yee S; Hitkari JA; Greenblatt EM
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
    Weil E; Cornet D; Sibony C; Mandelbaum J; Salat-Baroux J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1344-7. PubMed ID: 7962446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Oocyte donation: ethical aspects related to the donor].
    Englert Y; Rodesch C; Laruelle C; Govoerts I
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Mar; 25(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 9156715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "They were my eggs; they were her babies": known oocyte donors' conceptualizations of their reproductive material.
    Blyth E; Yee S; Tsang AK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1134-40. PubMed ID: 22082787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring.
    Jadva V; Freeman T; Kramer W; Golombok S
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. To know or not to know? Dilemmas for women receiving unknown oocyte donation.
    Stuart-Smith SJ; Smith JA; Scott EJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jul; 27(7):2067-75. PubMed ID: 22493043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oocyte donation: particular technical and ethical aspects.
    Englert Y; Govaerts I
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13 Suppl 2():90-7. PubMed ID: 9665329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitude towards reciprocity as a motive for oocyte donation.
    Pennings G; Ravel C; Girard JM; Domin-Bernhard M; Provoost V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 225():194-198. PubMed ID: 29734085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
    Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
    Rumpíková T; Oborná I; Bělašková S; Rumpík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.
    Greenfeld DA; Mazure CM; Olive DL; Keefe DL
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Feb; 12(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 7670269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.
    Blakemore JK; Voigt P; Schiffman MR; Lee S; Besser AG; Fino ME
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 31300913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.