220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10655859)
1. A comparison of an opaque foam dressing versus a transparent film dressing in the management of skin tears in institutionalized subjects.
Thomas DR; Goode PS; LaMaster K; Tennyson T; Parnell LK
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):22-4, 27-8. PubMed ID: 10655859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new option in the treatment of skin tears for the institutionalized resident: formulated 2-octylcyanoacrylate topical bandage.
Milne CT; Corbett LQ
Geriatr Nurs; 2005; 26(5):321-5. PubMed ID: 16213985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin tears in institutionalized elderly: an epidemiological study.
McGough-Csarny J; Kopac CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Mar; 44(3A Suppl):14S-24S; discussion 25S. PubMed ID: 9625995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of partial-thickness burn wounds: results of a clinical study.
Schwarze H; Küntscher M; Uhlig C; Hierlemann H; Prantl L; Ottomann C; Hartmann B
Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Feb; 60(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18216512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining and classifying skin tears: need for a common language.
Payne RL; Martin ML
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1993 Jun; 39(5):16-20, 22-4, 26. PubMed ID: 8397703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split-thickness skin-graft donor wound healing.
Akita S; Akino K; Imaizumi T; Tanaka K; Anraku K; Yano H; Hirano A
Burns; 2006 Jun; 32(4):447-51. PubMed ID: 16621321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations.
Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F
Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers.
Jude EB; Apelqvist J; Spraul M; Martini J;
Diabet Med; 2007 Mar; 24(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 17305788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alternative dressing material for the split-thickness skin graft donor site: oxidized regenerated cellulose.
Uysal AC; Alagoz MS; Orbay H; Sensoz O
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Jul; 57(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 16799310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts: results of a clinical study.
Schwarze H; Küntscher M; Uhlig C; Hierlemann H; Prantl L; Noack N; Hartmann B
Burns; 2007 Nov; 33(7):850-4. PubMed ID: 17493762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a liquid dressing for minor nonbleeding abrasions and class I and II skin tears in the emergency department.
Singer AJ; Chale S; Taylor M; Domingo A; Ghazipura S; Khorasonchi A; Bienenfeld A
J Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 48(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 25456777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of using a lipido-colloid dressing for patients with traumatic digital wounds.
Ma KK; Chan MF; Pang SM
Clin Nurs Res; 2006 May; 15(2):119-34. PubMed ID: 16638830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Moisture and healing: beyond the jargon.
Bolton LL; Monte K; Pirone LA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Jan; 46(1A Suppl):51S-62S; quiz 63S-64S. PubMed ID: 10732640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
