610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10655861)
1. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing a foam composite to a hydrocellular foam dressing in the management of venous leg ulcers: a controlled clinical study.
Vanscheidt W; Sibbald RG; Eager CA
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Nov; 50(11):42-55. PubMed ID: 15545697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Treatment of chronic skin ulcers in the elderly. Descriptive study on the use of a hydrocellular dressing].
Martínez Cuervo F; Franco Gútiez T; López Rebordinos MT; Menéndez Menéndez S; Rodríguez Rodríguez B
Rev Enferm; 1998 Dec; 21(244):51-60. PubMed ID: 10076470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparative study of the hydrocellular dressing Allevyn and the hydrocolloid dressing Duoderm in the local treatment of leg ulcers].
Zuccarelli F
Phlebologie; 1992; 45(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 1302331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Experimental study. Reduction of pressure in areas of risk of developing pressure ulcers with a hydrocellular dressing].
Torra i Bou JE; Rueda López J; Ramón Cantón C
Rev Enferm; 2000 Mar; 23(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 10797781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of hydrocellular and hydrocolloid dressings for treatment of category II pressure ulcers in patients at primary and long-term care institutions.
Chamorro AM; Vidal Thomas MC; Mieras AS; Leiva A; Martínez MP; Hernández Yeste MMS;
Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Jun; 94():179-185. PubMed ID: 31048187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofilm hydrogel dressing: a clinical evaluation in the treatment of pressure sores.
Darkovich SL; Brown-Etris M; Spencer M
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1990; 29():47-60. PubMed ID: 2202317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simplifying modern wound management for nonprofessional caregivers.
Seaman S; Herbster S; Muglia J; Murray M; Rick C
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):18-27. PubMed ID: 11189544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
van Rijswijk L
Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers.
Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment with humid environment as compared to traditional cure. Clinical trial on primary care patients with venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers].
Capillas Pérez R; Cabré Aguilar V; Gil Colomé AM; Gaitano García A; Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 2000 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 10788945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds.
Thomas S; Banks V; Bale S; Fear-Price M; Hagelstein S; Harding KG; Orpin J; Thomas N
J Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 6(8):383-6. PubMed ID: 9341430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]