360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10656377)
1. Postimplant analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy: evidence for a learning curve in the first year at a single institution.
Lee WR; deGuzman AF; Bare RL; Marshall MG; McCullough DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 10656377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isotope selection for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy.
Cha CM; Potters L; Ashley R; Freeman K; Wang XH; Waldbaum R; Leibel S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Sep; 45(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 10487561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Potters L; Cao Y; Calugaru E; Torre T; Fearn P; Wang XH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jul; 50(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 11395226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Centralized multiinstitutional postimplant analysis for interstitial prostate brachytherapy.
Bice WS; Prestidge BR; Grimm PD; Friedland JL; Feygelman V; Roach M; Prete JJ; Dubois DF; Blasko JC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jul; 41(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 9652858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postimplantation dosimetric analysis of permanent transperineal prostate implantation: improved dose distributions with an intraoperative computer-optimized conformal planning technique.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen G; Venkatraman ES; Fung AY; Furhang E; Silvern D; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Sep; 48(2):601-8. PubMed ID: 10974481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of MRI- and CT-based post-implant dosimetric analysis of transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Prete JJ; Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Dubois DF; Hotchkiss LA
Radiat Oncol Investig; 1998; 6(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 9572685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry and cancer control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Robert Lee W; Deguzman AF; McMullen KP; McCullough DL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15629593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric quantifiers for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: is V(100) superior to D(90)?
Papagikos MA; Deguzman AF; Rossi PJ; McCullough DL; Clark PE; Lee WR
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 16344254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants.
Kestin LL; Jaffray DA; Edmundson GK; Martinez AA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Vicini FA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10656370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 10421545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability leads to significant differences in quantifiers of prostate implant adequacy.
Lee WR; Roach M; Michalski J; Moran B; Beyer D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Oct; 54(2):457-61. PubMed ID: 12243822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A survey of physics and dosimetry practice of permanent prostate brachytherapy in the United States.
Prete JJ; Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Friedland JL; Stock RG; Grimm PD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(4):1001-5. PubMed ID: 9531387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
