634 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10656389)
1. Optimal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: predictions for conventional external beam, IMRT, and brachytherapy from radiobiologic models.
King CR; DiPetrillo TA; Wazer DE
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 10656389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose escalation in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric and biological considerations.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Stewart RD; DiBiase SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2753-65. PubMed ID: 14516099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LDR vs. HDR brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: the view from radiobiological models.
King CR
Brachytherapy; 2002; 1(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 15062170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose escalation for localized prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus permanent transperineal brachytherapy.
Wong WW; Vora SA; Schild SE; Ezzell GA; Andrews PE; Ferrigni RG; Swanson SK
Cancer; 2009 Dec; 115(23):5596-606. PubMed ID: 19670452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of tumor repopulation on radiotherapy planning.
Wang JZ; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 15629615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer using equivalent uniform dose.
Wang JZ; Li XA
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12557976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of a large number of clinical studies for breast cancer radiotherapy: estimation of radiobiological parameters for treatment planning.
Guerrero M; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(20):3307-26. PubMed ID: 14620060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A radiobiological investigation on dose and dose rate for permanent implant brachytherapy of breast using 125I or 103Pd sources.
Baltas D; Lymperopoulou G; Löffler E; Mavroidis P
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2572-86. PubMed ID: 20632569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry.
Dicker AP; Lin CC; Leeper DB; Waterman FM
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 May; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 10875458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost for locally advanced gynecological cancer: radiobiological and dosimetric considerations.
Guerrero M; Li XA; Ma L; Linder J; Deyoung C; Erickson B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(3):933-9. PubMed ID: 15936580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-volume conundrum for response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy: summary dosimetric measures and their relationship to tumor control probability.
D'Souza WD; Thames HD; Kuban DA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 15050335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A detailed radiobiological and dosimetric analysis of biochemical outcomes in a case-control study of permanent prostate brachytherapy patients.
Butler WM; Stewart RR; Merrick GS
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):776-87. PubMed ID: 19378738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The low alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer: what does the clinical outcome of HDR brachytherapy tell us?
Wang JZ; Li XA; Yu CX; DiBiase SJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(4):1101-8. PubMed ID: 14575842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate.
Luxton G; Hancock SL; Boyer AL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):267-84. PubMed ID: 15093924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodology for biologically-based treatment planning for combined low-dose-rate (permanent implant) and high-dose-rate (fractionated) treatment of prostate cancer.
Zaider M; Zelefsky MJ; Cohen GN; Chui CS; Yorke ED; Ben-Porat L; Happersett L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):702-13. PubMed ID: 15708248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of prolonged fraction delivery times on tumor control: a note of caution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
Wang JZ; Li XA; D'Souza WD; Stewart RD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Oct; 57(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 12957268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy causes fewer side effects than three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy when used in combination with brachytherapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Forsythe K; Blacksburg S; Stone N; Stock RG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):630-5. PubMed ID: 22099032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of biologically equivalent dose-volume parameters for the treatment of prostate cancer with concomitant boost IMRT versus IMRT combined with brachytherapy.
Pieters BR; van de Kamer JB; van Herten YR; van Wieringen N; D'Olieslager GM; van der Heide UA; Koning CC
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 18378028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Normal tissue dosimetric comparison between HDR prostate implant boost and conformal external beam radiotherapy boost: potential for dose escalation.
Hsu IC; Pickett B; Shinohara K; Krieg R; Roach M; Phillips T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Mar; 46(4):851-8. PubMed ID: 10705005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acute genitourinary toxicity after high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy combined with hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: correlation between the urethral dose in HDR brachytherapy and the severity of acute genitourinary toxicity.
Akimoto T; Ito K; Saitoh J; Noda SE; Harashima K; Sakurai H; Nakayama Y; Yamamoto T; Suzuki K; Nakano T; Niibe H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 16168838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
