143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10656513)
1. Influence of pulse configuration and direction of coil current on excitatory effects of magnetic motor cortex and nerve stimulation.
Niehaus L; Meyer BU; Weyh T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Jan; 111(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10656513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types.
Kammer T; Beck S; Thielscher A; Laubis-Herrmann U; Topka H
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Feb; 112(2):250-8. PubMed ID: 11165526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of pulse configuration on magnetic stimulation.
Al-Mutawaly N; de Bruin H; Hasey G
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(5):361-70. PubMed ID: 14701997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Terao Y; Yuasa K; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):605-13. PubMed ID: 15721074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative assessment of best conventional with best theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols on human motor cortex excitability.
Zafar N; Paulus W; Sommer M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1393-9. PubMed ID: 18400556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. TMS of primary motor cortex with a biphasic pulse activates two independent sets of excitable neurones.
Sommer M; Ciocca M; Chieffo R; Hammond P; Neef A; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Hannah R
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 29352669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Taylor JL; Loo CK
J Affect Disord; 2007 Jan; 97(1-3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16887197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of pulse sequence, polarity and amplitude on magnetic stimulation of human and porcine peripheral nerve.
Maccabee PJ; Nagarajan SS; Amassian VE; Durand DM; Szabo AZ; Ahad AB; Cracco RQ; Lai KS; Eberle LP
J Physiol; 1998 Dec; 513 ( Pt 2)(Pt 2):571-85. PubMed ID: 9807005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil.
Maccabee PJ; Amassian VE; Cracco RQ; Cadwell JA
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988 Dec; 70(6):524-33. PubMed ID: 2461286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Changes in magnetic coil orientation affect the stimulation effects of human peripheral nerve].
Sun SJ
Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi; 1996 Mar; 87(3):66-76. PubMed ID: 8727356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative myogenic motor evoked potentials induced by direct electrical stimulation of the exposed motor cortex under isoflurane and sevoflurane.
Kawaguchi M; Sakamoto T; Ohnishi H; Shimizu K; Karasawa J; Furuya H
Anesth Analg; 1996 Mar; 82(3):593-9. PubMed ID: 8623967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation.
Mills KR; Boniface SJ; Schubert M
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Feb; 85(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 1371739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opposite optimal current flow directions for induction of neuroplasticity and excitation threshold in the human motor cortex.
Sommer M; Norden C; Schmack L; Rothkegel H; Lang N; Paulus W
Brain Stimul; 2013 May; 6(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 22885142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Transcranial cortex stimulation with magnetic field pulses: methodologic and physiologic principles].
Hess CW; Ludin HP
EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1988 Dec; 19(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 3145181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex.
Arai N; Okabe S; Furubayashi T; Mochizuki H; Iwata NK; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Ugawa Y
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Oct; 118(10):2227-33. PubMed ID: 17765606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of peripheral nerve stimulation on the responses in small hand muscles to transcranial magnetic cortex stimulation.
Date M; Schmid UD; Hess CW; Schmid J
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1991; 43():212-23. PubMed ID: 1773759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Sommer M; Alfaro A; Rummel M; Speck S; Lang N; Tings T; Paulus W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):838-44. PubMed ID: 16495145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of pulse shape in motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation using full-sine stimuli.
Delvendahl I; Gattinger N; Berger T; Gleich B; Siebner HR; Mall V
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115247. PubMed ID: 25514673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
Shepherd RK; Javel E
Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of waveform and current direction on short-interval intracortical facilitation: a paired-pulse TMS study.
Delvendahl I; Lindemann H; Jung NH; Pechmann A; Siebner HR; Mall V
Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 24075915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
