These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659059)
1. Radial sclerosing lesions of the breast: mammographic and pathologic correlation. Hassell P; Klein-Parker H; Worth A; Poon P Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Dec; 50(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 10659059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings. Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radial sclerosing lesions found on core needle biopsy: excision can be safely avoided. Grabenstetter A; Brennan SB; Jochelson MS; Brogi E; Morrow M; Tan LK; D'Alfonso TM Histopathology; 2024 Sep; 85(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 38845392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radial Scars and Complex Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast: Prevalence of Malignancy and Natural History Under Active Surveillance. Kraft E; Limberg JN; Dodelzon K; Newman LA; Simmons R; Swistel A; Ginter PS; Marti JL Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):5149-5155. PubMed ID: 33666811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management. Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. King TA; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ; Smetherman DH; Bolton JS; Stolier AJ; Fuhrman GM Am Surg; 2001 Sep; 67(9):907-12. PubMed ID: 11565774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast. Ioffe OB; Berg WA; Silverberg SG; Kumar D Mod Pathol; 1998 Aug; 11(8):721-7. PubMed ID: 9720499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality. DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Harvey SC; Smith DN Eur J Radiol; 1999 Jun; 30(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 10452723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in mammographically detected microcalcification in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ and recommendations for a selective approach to sentinel lymph node biopsy. Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC Pathol Res Pract; 2012 Apr; 208(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 22445178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of aggressiveness: risk of progression to invasive breast cancer by mammographic features of calcifications in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Lilleborge M; Falk RS; Hovda T; Holmen MM; Ursin G; Hofvind S Acta Radiol; 2022 May; 63(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 33887963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Radiologic Follow-up Study for Biopsy Diagnosis of Radial Scar/Radial Sclerosing Lesion without Other Atypia. Kalife ET; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Wang Y Breast J; 2016 Nov; 22(6):637-644. PubMed ID: 27540716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifications. Farshid G; Pieterse S; King JM; Robinson J Breast J; 2005; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15647073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth Dynamics of Mammographic Calcifications: Differentiating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from Benign Breast Disease. Grimm LJ; Miller MM; Thomas SM; Liu Y; Lo JY; Hwang ES; Hyslop T; Ryser MD Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31112087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. Grimm LJ; Ghate SV; Hwang ES; Soo MS Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1364-1371. PubMed ID: 28705686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast. Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass. Stomper PC; Geradts J; Edge SB; Levine EG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]