These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Updating reactivated memories in infancy: I. Passive- and active-exposure effects. Galluccio L Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Jul; 47(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 15959898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A computational model of prefrontal control in free recall: strategic memory use in the California Verbal Learning Task. Becker S; Lim J J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):821-32. PubMed ID: 14511535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of priming duration on retention over the first 1 1/2 years of life. Hsu VC; Rovee-Collier C; Hill DL; Grodkiewicz J; Joh AS Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Jul; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 15959899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: the effect of concurrent task performance. Bhatarah P; Ward G; Tan L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):215-29. PubMed ID: 16569142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Karpicke JD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of working memory load on long-term word priming. Baqués J; Sáiz D; Bowers JS Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 15279434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of simple- and complex-place contexts in the multiple-context paradigm. Isarida T; Isarida TK Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2399-412. PubMed ID: 20446185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Karpicke JD; Roediger HL Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):966-8. PubMed ID: 18276894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The simultaneous learning effect: why does simultaneous task learning improve retention? Burns DJ; Ladd MV Am J Psychol; 2006; 119(3):385-405. PubMed ID: 17061692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) performance in severely head-injured and neurologically normal adult males. Crosson B; Novack TA; Trenerry MR; Craig PL J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1988 Dec; 10(6):754-68. PubMed ID: 3235649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of multiple reminders on long-term retention in human infants. Hayne H Dev Psychobiol; 1990 Sep; 23(6):453-77. PubMed ID: 2272404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI. de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Independent paths in the development of infant learning and forgetting. Howe ML; Courage ML J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 Nov; 67(2):131-63. PubMed ID: 9388803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval. Clarke AJ; Butler LT Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differentiated forgetting rates of spatial knowledge in humans in the absence of repeated testing. Corazzini LL; Thinus-Blanc C; Nesa MP; Geminiani GC; Péruch P Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):678-88. PubMed ID: 18720220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]