These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659434)
1. Speaker identification using neural networks and wavelets. Phan F; Micheli-Tzanakou E; Sideman S IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 10659434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonstationary speech analysis using neural prediction. Zhu B; Micheli-Tzanakou E IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2000; 19(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 10659435 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward optimizing stream fusion in multistream recognition of speech. Mesgarani N; Thomas S; Hermansky H J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL14-8. PubMed ID: 21786862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of Novel Hearing Aids by Using Image Recognition Technology. Lin BS; Liu CF; Cheng CJ; Wang JJ; Liu C; Li J; Lin BS IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2019 May; 23(3):1163-1170. PubMed ID: 29994776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises. Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids. Wu YH; Bentler RA J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acoustic pattern recognition of /s/ misarticulation by the self-organizing map. Mujunen R; Leinonen L; Kangas J; Torkkola K Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(3):135-44. PubMed ID: 8325581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using a signal cancellation technique involving impulse response to assess directivity of hearing aids. Wu YH; Bentler RA J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3214-26. PubMed ID: 20000935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners. Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]