168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659732)
1. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Wolverton DE; Weber BL; Metz CE; Zhong W; Cummings SA
Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):519-26. PubMed ID: 12409590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study.
Gierach GL; Li H; Loud JT; Greene MH; Chow CK; Lan L; Prindiville SA; Eng-Wong J; Soballe PW; Giambartolomei C; Mai PL; Galbo CE; Nichols K; Calzone KA; Olopade OI; Gail MH; Giger ML
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(4):424. PubMed ID: 25159706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.
Kontos D; Bakic PR; Carton AK; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):283-98. PubMed ID: 19201357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1996 May; 41(5):909-23. PubMed ID: 8735257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.
Torres-Mejía G; De Stavola B; Allen DS; Pérez-Gavilán JJ; Ferreira JM; Fentiman IS; Dos Santos Silva I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1052-9. PubMed ID: 15894652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Medical management of women with inherited predisposition to breast cancer: indications and procedures for mammographic screening].
Lassetn C; Bonadona V
Bull Cancer; 2001 Jul; 88(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 11495821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1629-38. PubMed ID: 15551535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of near-term risk of developing breast cancer using computerized features from bilateral mammograms.
Sun W; Zheng B; Lure F; Wu T; Zhang J; Wang BY; Saltzstein EC; Qian W
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2014 Jul; 38(5):348-57. PubMed ID: 24725671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images.
Byng JW; Boyd NF; Little L; Lockwood G; Fishell E; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Oct; 5(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 8972250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
