226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659741)
1. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
Moy JP
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6480-95. PubMed ID: 21302803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications.
Granfors PR; Aufrichtig R
Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1324-31. PubMed ID: 10902562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 30488455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
Zhao W; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device.
Samant SS; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3557-67. PubMed ID: 17022252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterisation of the signal and noise transfer of CCD cameras for electron detection.
Meyer RR; Kirkland AI
Microsc Res Tech; 2000 May; 49(3):269-80. PubMed ID: 10816267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system.
Kyprianou IS; Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):613-26. PubMed ID: 15789608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) used in radiotherapy: image quality and dose measurements.
Cremers F; Frenzel T; Kausch C; Albers D; Schönborn T; Schmidt R
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):985-96. PubMed ID: 15191282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of fractal dimension in radiographs.
Veenland JF; Grashius JL; van der Meer F; Beckers AL; Gelsema ES
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):585-94. PubMed ID: 8860906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel EPID design for enhanced contrast and detective quantum efficiency.
Rottmann J; Morf D; Fueglistaller R; Zentai G; Star-Lack J; Berbeco R
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6297-306. PubMed ID: 27494207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-speed slot-scanning radiography using small-angle tomosynthesis: Investigation of spatial resolution.
Luckner C; Herbst M; Weber T; Beister M; Ritschl L; Kappler S; Maier A
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5454-5466. PubMed ID: 31529513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.
Hajdok G; Battista JJ; Cunningham IA
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3194-204. PubMed ID: 18697544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A quantum accounting and detective quantum efficiency analysis for video-based portal imaging.
Bissonnette JP; Cunningham IA; Jaffray DA; Fenster A; Munro P
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):815-26. PubMed ID: 9198014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
