135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659806)
1. Multiresolutional modification of speech signals for listeners with hearing impairment.
Erogul O; Karagöz I
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Jul; 36(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10659806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A spectral/temporal method for robust fundamental frequency tracking.
Zahorian SA; Hu H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4559-71. PubMed ID: 18537404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A sawtooth waveform inspired pitch estimator for speech and music.
Camacho A; Harris JG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1638-52. PubMed ID: 19045655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
DiGiovanni JJ; Nelson PB; Schlauch RS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impulse-noise suppression in speech using the stationary wavelet transform.
Nongpiur RC; Shpak DJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):866-79. PubMed ID: 23363105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal selection of wavelet-packet-based features using genetic algorithm in pathological assessment of patients' speech signal with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
Behroozmand R; Almasganj F
Comput Biol Med; 2007 Apr; 37(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 17034780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approximated affine projection algorithm for feedback cancellation in hearing aids.
Lee S; Kim IY; Park YC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Sep; 87(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 17644214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective and subjective evaluation of adaptive speech enhancement methods for functional MRI.
Ramachandran VR; Panahi IM; Milani AA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 20027572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The application of bionic wavelet transform to speech signal processing in cochlear implants using neural network simulations.
Yao J; Zhang YT
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1299-309. PubMed ID: 12450360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
Wu YH; Bentler RA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hybridizing conversational and clear speech to determine the degree of contribution of acoustic features to intelligibility.
Kain A; Amano-Kusumoto A; Hosom JP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2308-19. PubMed ID: 19062869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech.
Ludvigsen C; Elberling C; Keidser G; Poulsen T
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():190-5. PubMed ID: 2356726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
