BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10659939)

  • 1. The VATAM guidelines.
    Talmon J; Enning J; Castãneda G; Eurlings F; Hoyer D; Nykänen P; Sanz F; Thayer C; Vissers M
    Int J Med Inform; 1999 Dec; 56(1-3):107-15. PubMed ID: 10659939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inventory of validation approaches in selected health telematics projects.
    Nykänen P; Enning J; Talmon J; Hoyer D; Sanz F; Thayer C; Roine R; Vissers M; Eurlings F
    Int J Med Inform; 1999 Dec; 56(1-3):87-96. PubMed ID: 10659937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. VATAM: developing consensus in validation of health telematics applications.
    Enning J; Talmon J; Nykänen P; Marz J; Sanz F; Thayer C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1997; 43 Pt B():771-5. PubMed ID: 10179772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the quality of medical information technology economic evaluations: room for improvement.
    Eisenstein EL; Ortiz M; Anstrom KJ; Crosslin DR; Lobach DF
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():234-8. PubMed ID: 17238338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BEAM: Biomedical Equipment Assessment and Management.
    Pallikarakis N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Oct; 45(1-2):9. PubMed ID: 7889773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis: misguided guidelines?
    Naylor CD; Williams JI; Basinski A; Goel V
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):921-4. PubMed ID: 8448706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Apples and Oranges? Assessing Comparative Effectiveness and Comparative Value in the US and Other Countries.
    Levy AR; Garrison LP
    Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S1-3. PubMed ID: 20618787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of scientific evidence].
    Jovell AJ; Navarro-Rubio MD
    Med Clin (Barc); 1995 Dec; 105(19):740-3. PubMed ID: 8523956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations revisited.
    Laupacis A; Feeny D; Detsky AS; Tugwell PX
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):927-9. PubMed ID: 8448707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methodological approaches of health technology assessment.
    Goodman CS; Ahn R
    Int J Med Inform; 1999 Dec; 56(1-3):97-105. PubMed ID: 10659938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working group 4 report.
    Velasco M; Perleth M; Drummond M; Gürtner F; Jørgensen T; Jovell A; Malone J; Rüther A; Wild C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(2):361-422. PubMed ID: 12053427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basic concepts and fundamental issues in technology assessment.
    Franklin C
    Intensive Care Med; 1993; 19(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8486866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the impact of information communication technologies on complex organizational systems: a multi-disciplinary, multi-method framework.
    Westbrook JI; Braithwaite J; Iedema R; Coiera EW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1323-7. PubMed ID: 15361029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of the Biomedical Engineering Department in William Beaumont Hospital's technology assessment process.
    Patail BM; Aranha AN
    J Clin Eng; 1995; 20(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 10144456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On how technology can help nurses improve patient care.
    Moore R
    Nurs Times; 2009 May 19-25; 105(19):29. PubMed ID: 19544985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting digital health technologies for validation and piloting by healthcare providers: a decision-making perspective from ontario.
    Chahal A; Rudnick A
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 30714547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental Method for Evaluating Wireless Coexistence of Wi-Fi Medical Devices.
    LaSorte NJ; Seidman S; Guag J
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(s6):18-25. PubMed ID: 27854499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardization of the economic evaluation of health technologies. European developments.
    Rovira J
    Med Care; 1996 Dec; 34(12 Suppl):DS182-8. PubMed ID: 8969325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid response in health technology assessment: a Delphi study for a Brazilian guideline.
    Silva MT; Silva END; Barreto JOM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29884121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Health Information Technology -where are we heading?].
    Ash N; Levy I
    Harefuah; 2013 May; 152(5):254-6, 310. PubMed ID: 23885446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.