BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10660175)

  • 1. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves.
    Yun KL; Jamieson WR; Khonsari S; Burr LH; Munro AI; Sintek CF
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10660175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Goldman B; Verrier E; Petracek M; Wood J; Goldman S; David T;
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 12000166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
    Borger MA; Carson SM; Ivanov J; Rao V; Scully HE; Feindel CM; David TE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F; Schiemann M; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Ackermann H; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of high transvalvular to subvalvular velocity ratio early after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Cartier PA; Kon N; Johnson KG; Dumesnil JG; Doty DB;
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):75-81. PubMed ID: 11805953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis.
    Bach DS; Lemire MS; Eberhart D; Armstrong WF; Deeb GM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 10947047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis.
    Kirsch ME; Tzvetkov B; Vermes E; Pouzet B; Sauvat S; Loisance D
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 15974539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early hemodynamic evaluation of Trifecta and Freestyle bioprostheses in patients with a small aortic root: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.
    Tasca G; Stefano A; Giannico F; Lobiati E; Riva B; Galanti A; Triggiani M; Gamba A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 Sep; 23(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 25799714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing options for the small aortic root.
    Petracek MR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 11843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Stentless bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement].
    Fukui S; Matsumiya G; Matsue H; Sawa Y
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Mar; 108(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17405541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Vrandecic M; Fantini FA; Filho BG; de O; da C; Vrandecic E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A single center experience with the freestyle bioprosthesis: midterm results at the Québec Heart Institute.
    Dagenais F; Cartier P; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Lemieux M; Raymond G; Desaulniers D; Perron J; Bauset R; Baillot R; Doyle D
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):156-62. PubMed ID: 11805965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
    Nozohoor S; Nilsson J; Lührs C; Roijer A; Sjögren J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F; Abolmaali N; Dzemali O; Wittlinger T; Doss M; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.