These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10660193)

  • 1. Fatigue-induced changes to the biaxial mechanical properties of glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valve leaflets.
    Christie GW; Gross JF; Eberhardt CE
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):201-5. PubMed ID: 10660193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of the mechanical properties of leaflets from four second-generation porcine bioprostheses with biaxial testing techniques.
    Mayne AS; Christie GW; Smaill BH; Hunter PJ; Barratt-Boyes BG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Aug; 98(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 2755150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcine aortic valve bioprostheses: a morphologic comparison of the effects of fixation pressure.
    Hilbert SL; Barrick MK; Ferrans VJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 Jun; 24(6):773-87. PubMed ID: 2113925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomy of aortic heart valve leaflets: the influence of glutaraldehyde fixation on function.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S25-32; discussion S33. PubMed ID: 1389275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and ultrastructural comparison of cryopreservation and a novel cellular extraction of porcine aortic valve leaflets.
    Courtman DW; Pereira CA; Omar S; Langdon SE; Lee JM; Wilson GJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Dec; 29(12):1507-16. PubMed ID: 8600141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cyclic loading response of bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of fixation stress state on the collagen fiber architecture.
    Wells SM; Sellaro T; Sacks MS
    Biomaterials; 2005 May; 26(15):2611-9. PubMed ID: 15585264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is zero-pressure fixation of bioprosthetic valves truly stress free?
    Vesely I; Lozon A; Talman E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Aug; 106(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 8341070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero-pressure" fixation.
    Vesely I
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 1986174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inflammation and infection in nine surgically explanted Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic valves.
    Butany J; Zhou T; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; Thangaroopan M; Jegatheeswaran A; Feindel C; David TE
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 17868876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hydrodynamic performance of the Medtronic Freestyle Aortic Root Bioprosthesis.
    Yoganathan AP; Eberhardt CE; Walker PG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Sep; 3(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 8000594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties of porcine pulmonary valve leaflets: how do they differ from aortic leaflets?
    Christie GW; Barratt-Boyes BG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S195-9. PubMed ID: 7646158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical properties of a porcine aortic valve fixed with a naturally occurring crosslinking agent.
    Sung HW; Chang Y; Chiu CT; Chen CN; Liang HC
    Biomaterials; 1999 Oct; 20(19):1759-72. PubMed ID: 10509186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pericardial bioprosthesis: altered tissue shear properties following glutaraldehyde fixation.
    Boughner DR; Haldenby M; Hui AJ; Dunmore-Buyze J; Talman EA; Wan WK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):752-60. PubMed ID: 11128780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison between glutaraldehyde and diepoxide-fixed stentless porcine aortic valves: biochemical and mechanical characterization and resistance to mineralization.
    Myers DJ; Nakaya G; Girardot MN; Christie GW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S98-101. PubMed ID: 8581221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biaxial strain properties of elastase-digested porcine aortic valves.
    Adamczyk MM; Lee TC; Vesely I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):445-53. PubMed ID: 10888104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.