113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10662070)
1. Understanding decisions about child maltreatment.
Rossi PH; Schuerman J; Budde S
Eval Rev; 1999 Dec; 23(6):579-98. PubMed ID: 10662070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Decisions on placement and family preservation. Agreement and targeting.
Schuerman J; Rossi PH; Budde S
Eval Rev; 1999 Dec; 23(6):599-618. PubMed ID: 10662071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals' child welfare attitudes.
Benbenishty R; Davidson-Arad B; López M; Devaney J; Spratt T; Koopmans C; Knorth EJ; Witteman CL; Del Valle JF; Hayes D
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():63-75. PubMed ID: 25935254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why social workers do not implement decisions to remove children at risk from home.
Davidson-Arad B; Englechin-Segal D; Wozner Y; Gabriel R
Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Jun; 27(6):687-97. PubMed ID: 12818614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of an instrument to understand the child protective services decision-making process, with a focus on placement decisions.
Dettlaff AJ; Christopher Graham J; Holzman J; Baumann DJ; Fluke JD
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():24-34. PubMed ID: 25913382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse.
Britner PA; Mossler DG
Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Apr; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 12092801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Placement decisions and disparities among Aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect part A: comparisons of the 1998 and 2003 surveys.
Fallon B; Chabot M; Fluke J; Blackstock C; MacLaurin B; Tonmyr L
Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Jan; 37(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 23260121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model.
Rodrigues L; Calheiros M; Pereira C
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():35-49. PubMed ID: 25882668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.
DePanfilis D; Scannapieco M
Child Welfare; 1994; 73(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8005017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Criteria for placement decisions in protective services.
Meddin BJ
Child Welfare; 1984; 63(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 6744984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal requisites for social workers in child abuse and neglect situations.
Howing PT; Wodarski JS
Soc Work; 1992 Jul; 37(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 1641690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Child custody decisions in families experiencing woman abuse.
Saunders DG
Soc Work; 1994 Jan; 39(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 8310323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. End-of-life medical decision-making for children in custody: A collaborative, multi-stakeholder practical approach.
Carroll RS; Hirst E; Hudson M; Shaw M; Deutsch SA
Child Abuse Negl; 2020 May; 103():104441. PubMed ID: 32143092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Child protection decisions to substantiate hospital child protection teams' reports of suspected maltreatment.
Jedwab M; Benbenishty R; Chen W; Glasser S; Siegal G; Lerner-Geva L
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Feb; 40():132-41. PubMed ID: 25550100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding the investigation-stage overrepresentation of First Nations children in the child welfare system: an analysis of the First Nations component of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect 2008.
Sinha V; Trocmé N; Fallon B; MacLaurin B
Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Oct; 37(10):821-31. PubMed ID: 23332722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Participation of traumatized children and adolescents affected by provisional safeguards (removal and custody of children ace. to Para. 42 SGB VIII)_].
Rücker S; Büttner P; Fegert J; Petermann F
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2015 Sep; 43(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 26373387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Child abuse and neglect: an instrument to assist with case referral decision making.
Berger DK; Rolon Y; Sachs J; Wilson B
Health Soc Work; 1989 Feb; 14(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 2707685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction of court petitions in cases of alternative placement of children at risk: meaning-making strategies that social workers use to shape court decisions.
Leichtentritt R; Davidson-Arad B; Peled E
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2011 Jul; 81(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21729017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of risk in child abuse and neglect case investigations.
Meddin BJ
Child Abuse Negl; 1985; 9(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 4038901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Custody planning with HIV-affected families: considerations for child welfare workers.
Mason S
Child Welfare; 1998; 77(2):161-77. PubMed ID: 9513996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]