97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10662071)
1. Decisions on placement and family preservation. Agreement and targeting.
Schuerman J; Rossi PH; Budde S
Eval Rev; 1999 Dec; 23(6):599-618. PubMed ID: 10662071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding decisions about child maltreatment.
Rossi PH; Schuerman J; Budde S
Eval Rev; 1999 Dec; 23(6):579-98. PubMed ID: 10662070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse.
Britner PA; Mossler DG
Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Apr; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 12092801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The child welfare response to serious nonaccidental head trauma.
Jaudes PK; Bilaver LA
Child Welfare; 2004; 83(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 15002911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of an intensive in-home family treatment program to prevent out-of-home placement.
Tyuse SW; Hong PP; Stretch JJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2010 May; 7(3):200-18. PubMed ID: 20526940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why social workers do not implement decisions to remove children at risk from home.
Davidson-Arad B; Englechin-Segal D; Wozner Y; Gabriel R
Child Abuse Negl; 2003 Jun; 27(6):687-97. PubMed ID: 12818614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Construction of court petitions in cases of alternative placement of children at risk: meaning-making strategies that social workers use to shape court decisions.
Leichtentritt R; Davidson-Arad B; Peled E
Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2011 Jul; 81(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21729017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inter-rater reliability of the Illinois Structured Decision Support Protocol.
Kang HA; Poertner J
Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jun; 30(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 16782192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using administrative data to assess child safety in out-of-home care.
Garnier PC; Poertner J
Child Welfare; 2000; 79(5):597-613. PubMed ID: 11021349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Placement decisions and disparities among Aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect part A: comparisons of the 1998 and 2003 surveys.
Fallon B; Chabot M; Fluke J; Blackstock C; MacLaurin B; Tonmyr L
Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Jan; 37(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 23260121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing investigative decisions in child welfare: an exploratory use of intensive family preservation services.
Walton E
Child Welfare; 1997; 76(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 9130381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model.
Rodrigues L; Calheiros M; Pereira C
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():35-49. PubMed ID: 25882668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Criteria for placement decisions in protective services.
Meddin BJ
Child Welfare; 1984; 63(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 6744984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.
Heneghan AM; Horwitz SM; Leventhal JM
Pediatrics; 1996 Apr; 97(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 8632942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Participation of traumatized children and adolescents affected by provisional safeguards (removal and custody of children ace. to Para. 42 SGB VIII)_].
Rücker S; Büttner P; Fegert J; Petermann F
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2015 Sep; 43(5):357-64. PubMed ID: 26373387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an instrument to understand the child protective services decision-making process, with a focus on placement decisions.
Dettlaff AJ; Christopher Graham J; Holzman J; Baumann DJ; Fluke JD
Child Abuse Negl; 2015 Nov; 49():24-34. PubMed ID: 25913382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Family preservation: a potential not yet realized.
Kelly S; Blythe BJ
Child Welfare; 2000; 79(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 10659390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Child custody decisions in families experiencing woman abuse.
Saunders DG
Soc Work; 1994 Jan; 39(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 8310323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring alternate specifications to explain agency-level effects in placement decisions regarding aboriginal children: further analysis of the Canadian Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect Part B.
Chabot M; Fallon B; Tonmyr L; MacLaurin B; Fluke J; Blackstock C
Child Abuse Negl; 2013 Jan; 37(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 23266357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does family group decision making affect child welfare outcomes? Findings from a randomized control study.
Berzin SC; Cohen E; Thomas K; Dawson WC
Child Welfare; 2008; 87(4):35-54. PubMed ID: 19391466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
