139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10662101)
1. Peer review and performance improvement in a radiation oncology clinic.
Johnstone PA; Rohde DC; May BC; Peng YP; Hulick PR
Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 10662101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. American College of Radiology (ACR) Radiation Oncology Practice Accreditation: A pattern of change.
Fogh SE; Pope CH; Rosenthal SA; Conway PD; Hulick PR; Johnson JL; Mian TA; Das IJ; Lazar A; Thaker NG; Monzon BT
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2016; 6(5):e171-e177. PubMed ID: 27596035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a clinical chart audit programme.
Zissiadis Y; Harper E; Harper C
Australas Radiol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 16884422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Quality of a Radiation Oncology Case-Based, Peer-Review Program in an Integrated Academic and Community Cancer Center Network.
Thaker NG; Sturdevant L; Jhingran A; Das P; Delclos ME; Gunn GB; McAleer MF; Tereffe W; Choi SL; Frank SJ; Simeone WJ; Martinez W; Hahn SM; Famiglietti R; Kuban DA
J Oncol Pract; 2016 Apr; 12(4):e476-86. PubMed ID: 26931402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Group consensus peer review in radiation oncology: commitment to quality.
Duggar WN; Bhandari R; Yang CC; Vijayakumar S
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):55. PubMed ID: 29587867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Onsite Versus Online Chart Reviews as Part of the American College of Radiation Oncology Accreditation Program.
Hepel JT; Heron DE; Mundt AJ; Yashar C; Feigenberg S; Koltis G; Regine WF; Prasad D; Patel S; Sharma N; Hebert M; Wallis N; Kuettel M
J Oncol Pract; 2017 May; 13(5):e516-e521. PubMed ID: 28301278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Journey Toward High Reliability: A Comprehensive Safety Program to Improve Quality of Care and Safety Culture in a Large, Multisite Radiation Oncology Department.
Woodhouse KD; Volz E; Maity A; Gabriel PE; Solberg TD; Bergendahl HW; Hahn SM
J Oncol Pract; 2016 May; 12(5):e603-12. PubMed ID: 27026647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an oncology services performance improvement team.
Frank JL; Cramer MO
J Healthc Qual; 1998; 20(6):26-32. PubMed ID: 10351213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective peer review at Brooke Army Medical Center.
Zaloznik AJ; Montgomery RM
Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1992; 12(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10116283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation Oncology Quality Assessment Tool: A proposal for a new audit tool in modern radiation oncology.
Atwell DB; Booth C; Vignarajah DD; Knesl M; Buddle N; Hoozer M; Min M
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 63(5):691-697. PubMed ID: 31376236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ACR-ASTRO Practice Parameter for Communication: Radiation Oncology.
Schechter NR; Brown DW; Bovi JA; Dominello MM; Liu AK; Mattes MD; Michalski JM; Shih HA; Strom E; Wilkinson JB; Rosenthal SA; Hartford A
Am J Clin Oncol; 2020 Aug; 43(8):553-558. PubMed ID: 32520791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance peer review chart rounds in 2011: a survey of academic institutions in the United States.
Lawrence YR; Whiton MA; Symon Z; Wuthrick EJ; Doyle L; Harrison AS; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):590-5. PubMed ID: 22445006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation oncology practice accreditation.
Dobelbower RR; Cotter G; Schilling PJ; Parsai EI; Carroll JM
Rays; 2001; 26(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 11925792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical staff appointment and delineation of pediatric privileges in hospitals.
O'Connor ME;
Pediatrics; 2002 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):414-8. PubMed ID: 12165606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Credentialing, Certification, and Peer Review Essentials for the Neurosurgeon.
Pieters TA; Susa S; Agarwal N; Guthikonda B; Menger R; Schirmer C; Cozzens J; Steinmetz M; Rosenow J; Kimmell KT;
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():364-369. PubMed ID: 34243670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of quality assurance rounds in a Canadian radiation therapy department.
Lefresne S; Olivotto IA; Joe H; Blood PA; Olson RA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(3):e117-21. PubMed ID: 23195781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical staff appointment and delineation of pediatric privileges in hospitals.
Rauch DA; ;
Pediatrics; 2012 Apr; 129(4):784-7. PubMed ID: 22451705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External audit of clinical practice and medical decision making in a new Asian oncology center: results and implications for both developing and developed nations.
Shakespeare TP; Back MF; Lu JJ; Lee KM; Mukherjee RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):941-7. PubMed ID: 16297568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
