These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10662103)

  • 1. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
    Caron A; Neuhauser D
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 7(2):1-10. PubMed ID: 10346457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice variation of vaginal birth after cesarean and the influence of risk factors at patient level: a retrospective cohort study.
    Vankan E; Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Mol BJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Alink M; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Lim FT; Melman S; Sikkema MJ; Smits LJ; Visser H; Woiski M; Scheepers HC; Hermens RP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):158-165. PubMed ID: 27861697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.
    Fantini MP; Stivanello E; Frammartino B; Barone AP; Fusco D; Dallolio L; Cacciari P; Perucci CA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Aug; 6():100. PubMed ID: 16911770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women in the crossfire: forced repeat cesareans.
    Jukelevics N
    Birth; 2002 Jun; 29(2):149-50. PubMed ID: 12000419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project.
    Kazandjian VA; Lied TR
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1998 Apr; 24(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 9589331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.
    Bailit JL; Dooley SL; Peaceman AN
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 93(6):1025-30. PubMed ID: 10362175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates.
    Bailit J; Garrett J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 102(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 12850606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Factors associated with cesarean section in France. Results from the 1995 National Perinatal Survey].
    Guihard P; Blondel B
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Sep; 30(5):444-543. PubMed ID: 11598558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
    Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates for women with at least one previous caesarean section: a population based cohort study.
    Schemann K; Patterson JA; Nippita TA; Ford JB; Roberts CL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Aug; 15():179. PubMed ID: 26285692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates: a statewide program.
    Bickell NA; Zdeb MS; Applegate MS; Roohan PJ; Sui AL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 May; 87(5 Pt 1):664-7. PubMed ID: 8677064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of cesarean section rates in two German hospitals applying the 10-Group Classification System.
    Pulvermacher C; Van de Vondel P; Gerzen L; Gembruch U; Welchowski T; Schmid M; Merz WM
    J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep; 49(7):818-829. PubMed ID: 33827151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians.
    Davis LG; Riedmann GL; Sapiro M; Minogue JP; Kazer RR
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1994; 39(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8027851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Birth Certificate Validity and the Impact on Primary Cesarean Section Quality Measure in New York State.
    Josberger RE; Wu M; Nichols EL
    J Community Health; 2019 Apr; 44(2):222-229. PubMed ID: 30324538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
    Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
    Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.