380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10662289)
1. Stanford/UCSF merger dissolves. Stubborn faculty loyalty and lack of cooperation blamed.
Galdabini G
Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 Nov; 2(11):1, 5-7. PubMed ID: 10662289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Focus on San Francisco. UCSF Stanford Health Care breaks tradition.
Schneider P
Healthc Inform; 1998 Apr; 15(4):62-4, 66, 68-71. PubMed ID: 10180063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Going their ways. UCSF Stanford Health Care ends tumultuous, money-losing merger.
Kirchheimer B
Mod Healthc; 1999 Nov; 29(44):2, 14. PubMed ID: 10623251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audit: UCSF Stanford deal added to losses.
Rauber C
Mod Healthc; 1999 Sep; 29(36):20. PubMed ID: 10558267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-mortem on the Tulane-Columbia partnership. Industry bellwether or one-time bonanza?
Rollins G
Exec Solut Healthc Manag; 1999 Jun; 2(6):1, 4-6. PubMed ID: 10538252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Merger now a total split. UCSF Stanford partners end talks on several joint services.
Kirchheimer B
Mod Healthc; 2000 Feb; 30(7):12-3. PubMed ID: 11010020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Debt will keep us together. Mount Sinai NYU Health fights rumors of split.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2002 Jan; 32(3):22-3. PubMed ID: 11840850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Picking teams in N.C. Academic rivals form systems to defend against for-profits.
Snow C
Mod Healthc; 1997 May; 27(18):32, 34. PubMed ID: 10167915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What's it worth? Savings in UCSF-Stanford merger vary with auditor.
Shinkman R
Mod Healthc; 1997 Oct; 27(40):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10173634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons from the Allegheny bankruptcy.
Burns LR
LDI Issue Brief; 2000 Feb; 5(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 12523343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The power of two. UCSF and Stanford merge to prepare for changing market forces, finding the partnership beneficial to both rehab departments.
Myers C
Rehab Manag; 1998; 11(4):96-9. PubMed ID: 11066865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Case study. Stanford restructures to beat the teaching hospital blues.
Goben R
Med Netw Strategy Rep; 1995 Jan; 4(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 10152422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Fusion and privatisation of Giessen and Marburg University Hospitals in the network of Hessian academic medicine].
Leonhard JF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Apr; 131(16):927-8. PubMed ID: 16625488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Case study of a failed merger of hospital systems.
Sidorov J
Manag Care; 2003 Nov; 12(11):56-60. PubMed ID: 14666587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Camelot or common sense? The logic behind the UCSF/Stanford merger.
Van Etten P
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10091441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary: Less is better: lessons from the New York University-Mount Sinai merger.
Grossman RI; Berne R
Acad Med; 2010 Dec; 85(12):1817-8. PubMed ID: 20856097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seeking a return to profitability.
Goodell BW
Physician Exec; 2003; 29(5):6-15. PubMed ID: 14531178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure of the merger of the Mount Sinai and New York University hospitals and medical schools: part 1.
Kastor JA
Acad Med; 2010 Dec; 85(12):1823-7. PubMed ID: 20856096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. UCSF/Stanford: building a 'prestige cartel'.
Goldsmith J
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 10091442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Case study. Aggressive physician-led clinical reengineering helps University of California-San Francisco Medical Center stay competitive.
Weber DO
Strateg Healthc Excell; 1996 May; 9(5):1-10. PubMed ID: 10157255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]