1030 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10663359)
1. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heel ultrasonography in monitoring alendronate therapy: a four-year longitudinal study.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Montagnani A; Martini S; Gennari L; Mangeri M; Gennari C
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 12086353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.
Njeh CF; Hans D; Li J; Fan B; Fuerst T; He YQ; Tsuda-Futami E; Lu Y; Wu CY; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in QUS and BMD measurements with antiresorptive therapy: a two-year longitudinal study.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman
Calcif Tissue Int; 2001 Sep; 69(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 11683528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population.
Haugeberg G; Ørstavik RE; Uhlig T; Falch JA; Halse JI; Kvien TK
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound parameters in patients with Klinefelter's syndrome after long-term testosterone substitution.
van den Bergh JP; Hermus AR; Spruyt AI; Sweep CG; Corstens FH; Smals AG
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative ultrasound and bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with risk factors for osteoporosis.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 11204441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential effects of primary hyperparathyroidism on ultrasound properties of bone.
Ingle BM; Thomas WE; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Jul; 13(7):572-8. PubMed ID: 12111018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status.
Langton CM; Langton DK
Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Maris T; Dimitriou P; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 15145486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of quantitative heel ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in determining bone mineral density in chronic haemodialysis patients.
Taal MW; Cassidy MJ; Pearson D; Green D; Masud T
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1999 Aug; 14(8):1917-21. PubMed ID: 10462271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of fracture discrimination using calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry in women with a history of fracture at sites other than the spine and hip.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2002 Sep; 71(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 12154392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
