132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10663761)
1. Can we see enough? A comparative study of film-screen vs digital radiographs in small lesions in rheumatoid arthritis.
van der Jagt EJ; Hofman S; Kraft BM; van Leeuwen MA
Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(2):304-7. PubMed ID: 10663761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.
Piraino DW; Davros WJ; Lieber M; Richmond BJ; Schils JP; Recht MP; Grooff PN; Belhobek GH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 9888764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.
Jónsson A; Borg A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Sloth M; Petterson H
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8011377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patterns of radiographic changes in hands and feet of rheumatoid arthritis in Saudi Arabia.
Al-Arfaj AS; Al-Boukai AA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Jul; 26(7):1065-7. PubMed ID: 16047054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ability of oblique foot radiographs to detect erosions in early arthritis: results in the ESPOIR cohort.
Devauchelle-Pensec V; Josseaume T; Samjee I; Dougados M; Combe B; Saraux A
Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Dec; 59(12):1729-34. PubMed ID: 19035426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic progression on radiographs of hands and feet during the first 3 years of rheumatoid arthritis measured according to Sharp's method (van der Heijde modification).
van der Heijde DM; van Leeuwen MA; van Riel PL; van de Putte LB
J Rheumatol; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1792-6. PubMed ID: 8523365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ability of foot radiographs to predict rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early arthritis.
Devauchelle Pensec V; Saraux A; Berthelot JM; Alapetite S; Jousse S; Chales G; Thorel JB; Hoang S; Nouy-Trolle I; Martin A; Chiocchia G; Youinou P; Le Goff P
J Rheumatol; 2004 Jan; 31(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 14705220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of radiographs of the hands and feet in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Devauchelle-Pensec V; Saraux A; Alapetite S; Colin D; Le Goff P
Joint Bone Spine; 2002 Oct; 69(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 12477226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic changes in the feet of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. GRISAR (Gruppo Reumatologi Italiani Studio Artrite Reumatoide).
Priolo F; Bacarini L; Cammisa M; Cerase A; Ferrara R; Della Casa-Alberighi O
J Rheumatol; 1997 Nov; 24(11):2113-8. PubMed ID: 9375868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of roentgen pictures in rheumatoid arthritis].
van der Heijde DM; Boers M
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Sep; 141(36):1725-30. PubMed ID: 9545714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two detail screen-film systems using a rheumatoid erosion model.
De Smet AA; Goin JE; Arnett GR; Chang CH; Martin NL; Rosenthal SJ
Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 6618826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decrease in bone mineral density during three months after diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis measured by digital X-ray radiogrammetry predicts radiographic joint damage after one year.
Ziegelasch M; Forslind K; Skogh T; Riklund K; Kastbom A; Berglin E
Arthritis Res Ther; 2017 Sep; 19(1):195. PubMed ID: 28865482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and hard copy of computed radiography in full and two-thirds sizes in detection of interstitial lung disease.
Kondoh H; Ikezoe J; Inamura K; Kuroda C; Kozuka T
J Digit Imaging; 1994 Nov; 7(4):193-5. PubMed ID: 7858016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W
Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Progression and repair in radiographs of hands and forefeet in early rheumatoid arthritis.
Menninger H; Meixner C; Söndgen W
J Rheumatol; 1995 Jun; 22(6):1048-54. PubMed ID: 7674229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective study of the radiological changes in hands, feet, and cervical spine in adult rheumatoid disease.
Winfield J; Young A; Williams P; Corbett M
Ann Rheum Dis; 1983 Dec; 42(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 6651365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Detection of small bone lesions with digital radiography using storage phosphors].
Salvini E; Zincone G; Fossati N; Crivellaro M; Crespi A; Loda A; Paruccini N; Pastori R
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):705-8. PubMed ID: 2057602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
