These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1066445)

  • 1. Abrasion of restorative materials by toothaste.
    Heath JR; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1976 Apr; 3(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 1066445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of water on the abrasion of restorative materials.
    Heath JR; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Apr; 4(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 266053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of composite type and different sources of polymerization light on in vitro toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion resistance.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 10785302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on enamel.
    Jagger DC; Harrison A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Apr; 22(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 7769526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface changes on dental materials. The influence of two different dentifrices on surface roughness measured by laser reflexion and profilometer techniques.
    Johannsen G; Redmalm G; Rydén H
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):267-76. PubMed ID: 2603131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion.
    Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate on the surface roughness of dental materials and human dental enamel.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Garcia-Godoy A; Garcia-Godoy C
    Am J Dent; 2009 Mar; 22 Spec No A():21A-24A. PubMed ID: 19472558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel.
    Yu H; Wegehaupt FJ; Wiegand A; Roos M; Attin T; Buchalla W
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):913-22. PubMed ID: 19674824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface roughness and gloss of current CAD/CAM resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
    Koizumi H; Saiki O; Nogawa H; Hiraba H; Okazaki T; Matsumura H
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 26632238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [An in-vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 2. Toothbrush/toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation].
    Krejci I; Albertoni M; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1164-8. PubMed ID: 2237350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Composites versus amalgam: comparative measurements of abrasion resistance in vivo: 1-year results].
    Meier C; Lutz F
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1979 Mar; 89(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 293032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toothbrush-dentifrice abrasion. A suggested standard method.
    Harrington E; Jones PA; Fisher SE; Wilson HJ
    Br Dent J; 1982 Aug; 153(4):135-8. PubMed ID: 6957220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
    Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The surface roughness of restorative materials and dental tissues after polishing with prophylaxis and polishing pastes.
    Roulet JF; Roulet-Mehrens TK
    J Periodontol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 6951995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion.
    Takahashi R; Jin J; Nikaido T; Tagami J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 23370873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness.
    Mörmann WH; Stawarczyk B; Ender A; Sener B; Attin T; Mehl A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Apr; 20():113-25. PubMed ID: 23455168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RELATIONSHIP OF CAVITY DESIGN TO RESTORATIVE MATERIALS.
    MAHLER DB; TERKLA LG
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():149-57. PubMed ID: 14276023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of cariogenic biofilm challenge on the surface hardness of direct restorative materials in situ.
    Barbosa RP; Pereira-Cenci T; Silva WM; Coelho-de-Souza FH; Demarco FF; Cenci MS
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 22326721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating.
    Hotta M; Hirukawa H
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 8008609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.