These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10664783)
1. Collisions between moving visual targets: what controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Sekuler AB; Sekuler R Perception; 1999; 28(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10664783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Watanabe K; Shimojo S Perception; 1998; 27(9):1041-54. PubMed ID: 10341934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Disambiguating the Stream/Bounce Illusion With Inference. Grove PM; Robertson C; Harris LR Multisens Res; 2016; 29(4-5):453-64. PubMed ID: 29384612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Motion parallel to line orientation: disambiguation of motion percepts. Francis G; Kim H Perception; 1999; 28(10):1243-55. PubMed ID: 10694972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Figure ground segregation modulates perceived direction of ambiguous moving gratings and plaids. Tommasi L; Vallortigara G Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(4):777-87. PubMed ID: 10341964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stream/bounce event perception reveals a temporal limit of motion correspondence based on surface feature over space and time. Kawachi Y; Kawabe T; Gyoba J Iperception; 2011; 2(5):428-39. PubMed ID: 23145236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Misperceptions of trajectories of dots moving through the blind spot. Tripathy SP; Barrett BT Perception; 2006; 35(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 16491715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How do object reference frames and motion vector decomposition emerge in laminar cortical circuits? Grossberg S; Léveillé J; Versace M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1147-70. PubMed ID: 21336518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Judgments of synchrony between auditory and moving or still visual stimuli. Fouriezos G; Capstick G; Monette F; Bellemare C; Parkinson M; Dumoulin A Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Dec; 61(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 18266504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Motion capture depends on signal strength. Festa-Martino E; Welch L Perception; 2001; 30(4):489-510. PubMed ID: 11383194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optic-flow-based perception of two-dimensional trajectories and the effects of a single landmark. Bertin RJ; Israël I Perception; 2005; 34(4):453-75. PubMed ID: 15943053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion. Sterzer P; Russ MO; Preibisch C; Kleinschmidt A Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):908-16. PubMed ID: 11906231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects. Kaneko H; Uchikawa K Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual organization of apparent motion in the Ternus display. He ZJ; Ooi TL Perception; 1999; 28(7):877-92. PubMed ID: 10664779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The whole moves less than the spin of its parts. Kohler PJ; Caplovitz GP; Tse PU Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):675-9. PubMed ID: 19429950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual motion disambiguation by a subliminal sound. Dufour A; Touzalin P; Moessinger M; Brochard R; Després O Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 17977748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-Level Motion Characteristics Do Not Account for Perceptions of Stream-Bounce Stimuli. Zeljko M; Grove PM Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 27697913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]