165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10664941)
1. Biopsy-based comparison of liquid-based, thin-layer preparations to conventional Pap smears.
Vassilakos P; Schwartz D; de Marval F; Yousfi L; Broquet G; Mathez-Loic F; Campana A; Major A
J Reprod Med; 2000 Jan; 45(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 10664941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of thin-layer preparations vs. conventional Pap smears in a blinded, split-sample study. Extended cytologic evaluation.
Hessling JJ; Raso DS; Schiffer B; Callicott J; Husain M; Taylor D
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 11725731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears. Including initial biopsy results.
Bishop JW; Bigner SH; Colgan TJ; Husain M; Howell LP; McIntosh KM; Taylor DA; Sadeghi MH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 9479339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct-to-vial experience with AutoCyte PREP in a small New England regional cytology practice.
Marino JF; Fremont-Smith M
J Reprod Med; 2001 Apr; 46(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 11354836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. Direct-to-vial performance.
Tench W
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):912-6. PubMed ID: 11127103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
Bergeron C; Bishop J; Lemarie A; Cas F; Ayivi J; Huynh B; Barrasso R
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.
Minge L; Fleming M; VanGeem T; Bishop JW
J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10756493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expression of MN/CA9 protein in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance is a diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia and neoplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(5):1108-21. PubMed ID: 10699902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Nicolau SM; Stávale JN; Focchi J; Castelo A; Dôres GB; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Lorincz A; Rodrigues de Lima G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualifying the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy.
Genest DR; Dean B; Lee KR; Sheets E; Crum CP; Cibas ES
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):338-41. PubMed ID: 9648902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liqui-Prep® versus conventional Papanicolaou smear to detect cervical cells abnormality by split-sample technique: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.
Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S; Nguansangiam S; Manusirivithaya S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20063407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Oral contraceptive pills are associated with artifacts in ThinPrep Pap smears that mimic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Morrison C; Prokorym P; Piquero C; Wakely PE; Nuovo GJ
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12704686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
Howell LP; Davis RL; Belk TI; Agdigos R; Lowe J
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional pap smear and liquid-based cervical cytology smear: comparison from the same patient.
Confortini M; Bulgaresi P; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi FM; Cecchini S; Cipparrone I; Maddau C; Rossi R; Troni GM; Zappa M; Ciatto S
Tumori; 2002; 88(4):288-90. PubMed ID: 12400979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
