These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10665172)

  • 1. The design, errors and costs of a local adult oral health survey.
    Simmons SR; Edger TM
    Community Dent Health; 1999 Dec; 16(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing response reliability of health interview surveys using reinterviews.
    Fabricant SJ; Harpham T
    Bull World Health Organ; 1993; 71(3-4):341-8. PubMed ID: 8324853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Second National Oral Health Survey of Vietnam, 1999: background and methodology.
    Roberts-Thomson KF; Spencer AJ; Do LG; Szuster FS; Hai TD; Nguyen TT
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Jun; 106(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 20608310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Body mass index: comparing mean values and prevalence rates from telephone and examination surveys.
    Paccaud F; Wietlisbach V; Rickenbach M
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2001 Feb; 49(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 11226917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Health Interview Survey: research for the 1995-2004 redesign.
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1999 Jul; (126):1-119. PubMed ID: 10495692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP): a health survey in an East German region. Objectives and design of the oral health section.
    Hensel E; Gesch D; Biffar R; Bernhardt O; Kocher T; Splieth C; Born G; John U
    Quintessence Int; 2003 May; 34(5):370-8. PubMed ID: 12795357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do public health surveys provide representative data? Comparison of three different sampling approaches in the adult population of Croatia.
    Kolcić I; Polasek O
    Coll Antropol; 2009 Apr; 33 Suppl 1():153-8. PubMed ID: 19563162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prolonged recruitment efforts in health surveys: effects on response, costs, and potential bias.
    Holle R; Hochadel M; Reitmeir P; Meisinger C; Wichmann HE;
    Epidemiology; 2006 Nov; 17(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 17003684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Functional bucco-dental restoration cost for adolescents aged 16 to 20 in the Geneva resident population (survey 1970-72). I. -- Description of estimates (author's transl)].
    Lang R; Ramaciotti D
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1977; 25(1):41-65. PubMed ID: 617867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimates from two survey designs: national hospital discharge survey.
    Haupt BJ; Kozak LJ
    Vital Health Stat 13; 1992 May; (111):1-75. PubMed ID: 1376945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching dental practice board data to the health authority population register.
    Tickle M; Hayhurst G; Moulding G; Jenner T; Blinkhorn A
    Community Dent Health; 2001 Mar; 18(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11421404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of results from an alcohol survey of a prerecruited Internet panel and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    Heeren T; Edwards EM; Dennis JM; Rodkin S; Hingson RW; Rosenbloom DL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Feb; 32(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 18162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The design effect and cluster samples: optimising tuberculosis prevalence surveys.
    Williams B; Gopi PG; Borgdorff MW; Yamada N; Dye C
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2008 Oct; 12(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 18812038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The 'number needed to sample' in primary care research. Comparison of two primary care sampling frames for chronic back pain.
    Smith BH; Hannaford PC; Elliott AM; Smith WC; Chambers WA
    Fam Pract; 2005 Apr; 22(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 15722397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chapter V. A comparison of CATI and non-CATI questionnaires.
    Groves RM; Mathiowetz NA
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):33-9. PubMed ID: 15791754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-response in a survey of cardiovascular risk factors in the Dutch population: determinants and resulting biases.
    Boshuizen HC; Viet AL; Picavet HS; Botterweck A; van Loon AJ
    Public Health; 2006 Apr; 120(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 16364384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation.
    Lepkowski JM; Mosher WD; Davis KE; Groves RM; van Hoewyk J; Willem J
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2006 Jul; (142):1-82. PubMed ID: 16999003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample designs for measuring the health of small racial/ethnic subgroups.
    Elliott MN; Finch BK; Klein D; Ma S; Do DP; Beckett MK; Orr N; Lurie N
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(20):4016-29. PubMed ID: 18351713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.