These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10665204)

  • 1. Older observers' tolerance of optical blur: age differences in the identification of defocused text signs.
    Kline DW; Buck K; Sell Y; Bolan TL; Dewar RE
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 10665204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolution of blur in the older eye: neural compensation in addition to optics?
    Jung GH; Kline DW
    J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):7. PubMed ID: 20616120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers' recognition performance under day or night conditions.
    Wood JM; Owens DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):698-705. PubMed ID: 16127335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of young and older drivers on a static acuity test under photopic and mesopic luminance conditions.
    Sturr JF; Kline GE; Taub HA
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2376405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.
    Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 26189873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The visibility of symbolic highway signs can be increased among drivers of all ages.
    Kline DW; Fuchs P
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 8509103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age, luminance, and print legibility in homes, offices, and public places.
    Charness N; Dijkstra K
    Hum Factors; 1999 Jun; 41(2):173-93. PubMed ID: 10422530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search for traffic signs: the effects of clutter, luminance, and aging.
    Ho G; Scialfa CT; Caird JK; Graw T
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):194-207. PubMed ID: 11592661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visibility distance of highway signs among young, middle-aged, and older observers: icons are better than text.
    Babbitt Kline TJ; Ghali LM; Kline DW; Brown S
    Hum Factors; 1990 Oct; 32(5):609-19. PubMed ID: 2074112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision and night driving abilities of elderly drivers.
    Gruber N; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 23683029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Different Levels of Refractive Blur on Nighttime Pedestrian Visibility.
    Wood JM; Marszalek R; Carberry T; Lacherez P; Collins MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 56(8):4480-5. PubMed ID: 26193924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and the perception of speed.
    Norman JF; Ross HE; Hawkes LM; Long JR
    Perception; 2003; 32(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 12613788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the legibility of a single letter E viewed at different display angles.
    Cai H; Green PA; Kim JJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jul; 44(4):575-87. PubMed ID: 23254109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nighttime legibility of highway signs as a function of their luminance characteristics.
    Olson PL; Bernstein A
    Hum Factors; 1979 Apr; 21(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 489020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential effects of refractive blur on day and nighttime driving performance.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Chaparro A; Marszalek R; Carberry T; Lacherez P; Chu BS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(4):2284-9. PubMed ID: 24618322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards.
    Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of optical defocus on detection and recognition of vanishing optotype letters in the fovea and periphery.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Oct; 53(11):7063-70. PubMed ID: 22969070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age differences in reading with distraction: sensory or inhibitory deficits?
    Mund I; Bell R; Buchner A
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):886-97. PubMed ID: 20853960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dioptric blur on reading performance.
    Chung ST; Jarvis SH; Cheung SH
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1584-94. PubMed ID: 17442363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flicker Sensitivity in Normal Aging--Monocular Tests of Retinal Function at Photopic and Mesopic Light Levels.
    Bi W; Gillespie-Gallery H; Binns A; Barbur JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Feb; 57(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 26842756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.