These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10665878)

  • 21. Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint.
    Schibany N; Ba-Ssalamah A; Marlovits S; Mlynarik V; Nöbauer-Huhmann IM; Striessnig G; Shodjai-Baghini M; Heinze G; Trattnig S
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 16036161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
    Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The meniscal roots: gross anatomic correlation with 3-T MRI findings.
    Brody JM; Hulstyn MJ; Fleming BC; Tung GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):W446-50. PubMed ID: 17449741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The knee: surface-coil MR imaging at 1.5 T1.
    Beltran J; Noto AM; Mosure JC; Weiss KL; Zuelzer W; Christoforidis AJ
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 3704154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Posterolateral aspect of the knee: improved MR imaging with a coronal oblique technique.
    Yu JS; Salonen DC; Hodler J; Haghighi P; Trudell D; Resnick D
    Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 8539378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Anterior cruciate ligament: oblique sagittal MR imaging.
    Buckwalter KA; Pennes DR
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):276-7. PubMed ID: 2315495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anterior transverse ligament of the knee: MR imaging and anatomic study using clinical and cadaveric material with emphasis on its contribution to meniscal tears.
    de Abreu MR; Chung CB; Trudell D; Resnick D
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 17449381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Magnetic resonance microscopic images with 50-mm field-of-view of the medial aspect of the knee.
    Niitsu M; Ikeda K
    Acta Radiol; 2004 Nov; 45(7):760-8. PubMed ID: 15624520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee and correlation with normal anatomy.
    Mesgarzadeh M; Schneck CD; Bonakdarpour A
    Radiographics; 1988 Jul; 8(4):707-33. PubMed ID: 3175084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Knees of trained long-distance runners: MR imaging before and after competition.
    Shellock FG; Mink JH
    Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):635-7. PubMed ID: 2027965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High resolution nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of pig knees at 4.7 T.
    Robinson EM; Mackenzie IS; Freemont A; Jasani MK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(5):591-4. PubMed ID: 3226242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Morphologic characterization of meniscal root ligaments in the human knee with magnetic resonance microscopy at 11.7 and 3 T.
    Chang EY; Biswas R; DiCamillo P; Statum S; Tafur M; Bydder GM; Chung CB
    Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1395-402. PubMed ID: 24957332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Visualization of Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Using 3D Reconstructed Variable Refocus Flip Angle-Turbo Spin Echo T2 Weighted Image].
    Yokosawa K; Sasaki K; Muramatsu K; Ono T; Izawa H; Hachiya Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 May; 72(5):416-23. PubMed ID: 27211087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ex-vivo MR imaging of the cruciate ligaments.
    Yao L; Sherwood JW
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1991; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2009495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differences in MR signal intensity of lateral collateral ligament of knee joint on fat-suppressed proton density-weighted imaging.
    Lee HN; Ahn SE; Park JS; Ryu KN; Jin W; Park YK; Huh Y
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1059):20150893. PubMed ID: 26783715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transverse geniculate ligament of the knee: appearance and frequency on plain radiographs.
    Sintzoff SA; Stallenberg B; Gillard I; Gevenois PA; Matos C; Struyven J
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Sep; 65(777):766-8. PubMed ID: 1393411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acceleration of knee magnetic resonance imaging using a combination of compressed sensing and commercially available deep learning reconstruction: a preliminary study.
    Akai H; Yasaka K; Sugawara H; Tajima T; Kamitani M; Furuta T; Akahane M; Yoshioka N; Ohtomo K; Abe O; Kiryu S
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):5. PubMed ID: 36624404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MRI evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee: assessment in routine 1.5-T scans.
    Helito CP; Helito PV; Costa HP; Bordalo-Rodrigues M; Pecora JR; Camanho GL; Demange MK
    Skeletal Radiol; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1421-7. PubMed ID: 25085699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The anterior intermeniscal ligament of the knee: an anatomic and MR study.
    Marcheix PS; Marcheix B; Siegler J; Bouillet P; Chaynes P; Valleix D; Mabit C
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2009 Jun; 31(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 19234659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.