These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1066608)

  • 1. A study of the resolution of dental films and screens.
    Thunthy KH; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1976 Aug; 42(2):255-66. PubMed ID: 1066608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-yield radiography of the maxillofacial complex using the free focus and conventional imaging concepts. The resolution performance of nonscreen and screen-film combinations.
    Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Sep; 56(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 6579466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of XD/A Plus and ST8G films for cephalometric radiography with Grenex G8 and BH-III screens.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):293-9. PubMed ID: 9117764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of xeroradiographs with occlusal and screen films.
    Thunthy KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Jun; 45(6):959-64. PubMed ID: 277860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of potential applications of intensifying screens in intraoral radiography.
    Stephens RG; Kogon SL; Reid JA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 6960313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rare earth screens for panoramic radiography.
    Hurlburt CE; Coggins LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 6584845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screen-film combinations used for cephalometric radiography.
    Hurlburt C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Nov; 46(5):721-4. PubMed ID: 280863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
    Okano T; Yoda E
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.