These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1066608)

  • 21. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts.
    Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The determination of suitable film-screen cassette combinations for orthodontic x-ray technics].
    Fischer-Brandies H; Lindner K
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Jun; 51(3):149-54. PubMed ID: 2373449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visually detectable resolution of intraoral dental films.
    Künzel A; Scherkowski D; Willers R; Becker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intraoral xeroradiography.
    White SC; Stafford ML; Beeninga LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Dec; 46(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 282550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of dental and dental DX roentgen films produced by the WZF Foton].
    Mlosek K; Bończyk J; Winnicka-Szmielew B
    Pol Przegl Radiol; 1986; 50(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 3543882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of E-speed film with added filtration.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    Hurlburt CE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digitisation and display of intra-oral films.
    Attaelmanan A; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 10808223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ; Goos F
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.