These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Mechanical properties and clinical performance of a gallium restorative material. Osborne JW; Summitt JB Oper Dent; 1995; 20(6):241-5. PubMed ID: 8710706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gallium restorative materials. McComb D J Can Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 64(9):645-7. PubMed ID: 9812433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of water contamination on dimensional change and corrosion properties of a gallium alloy. Venugopalan R; Broome JC; Lucas LC Dent Mater; 1998 Jun; 14(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 10196793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bonding of amalgam and a gallium alloy to bovine dentin. Phrukkanon S; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 9760922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical retention versus bonding of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations. Eakle WS; Staninec M; Yip RL; Chavez MA J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):351-4. PubMed ID: 7990038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy. Kiremitci A; Bolay S J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study. Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative. DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental post-operative sensitivity associated with a gallium-based restorative material. Dunne SM; Abraham R Br Dent J; 2000 Sep; 189(6):310-3. PubMed ID: 11060951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth. Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars. Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials. Salama FS J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]