187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10667155)
1. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histology correlation with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology diagnoses: An argument to ensure ASCUS follow-up that is as aggressive as that for LSIL.
Dvorak KA; Finnemore M; Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Oct; 21(4):292-5. PubMed ID: 10495326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in liquid-based cytologic specimens: results of reflex human papillomavirus testing and histologic follow-up in routine practice with comparison of interpretive and probabilistic reporting methods.
Levi AW; Kelly DP; Rosenthal DL; Ronnett BM
Cancer; 2003 Aug; 99(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 12925979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up.
Gupta D; Kannan V; Komaromy-Hiller G; Kline TS
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11284305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Solomon D; Frable WJ; Vooijs GP; Wilbur DC; Amma NS; Collins RJ; Davey DD; Knight BK; Luff RD; Meisels A; Navin J; Rosenthal DL; Sauer T; Stoler M; Suprun HZ; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 9479320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic study of 52 cases.
Auger M; Charbonneau M; Arseneau J
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 9390122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Stratification of the risk of association with, or progression to, squamous intraepithelial lesions based on morphologic subcategorization.
Sheils LA; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1065-72. PubMed ID: 9250300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: is it worthwhile to qualify them further?
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sehgal A; Singh V; Khan IU; Mitra AB
Indian J Cancer; 2003; 40(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 14716128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
