These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10667685)

  • 1. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics.
    Fraser CG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 10667685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposal for the modification of the conventional model for establishing performance specifications.
    Oosterhuis WP; Sandberg S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):925-37. PubMed ID: 25901717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
    Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 1999 Stockholm Consensus Conference on quality specifications in laboratory medicine.
    Fraser CG
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):837-40. PubMed ID: 25720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality specifications for reference methods.
    Thienpont LM
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):535-8. PubMed ID: 10667694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of procedures for evaluating laboratory performance in external quality assessment schemes for lead in blood and aluminum in serum demonstrates the need for common quality specifications.
    Taylor A; Angerer J; Claeys F; Kristiansen J; Mazarrasa O; Menditto A; Patriarca M; Pineau A; Schoeters I; Sykes C; Valkonen S; Weykamp C
    Clin Chem; 2002 Nov; 48(11):2000-7. PubMed ID: 12406986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Setting quality specifications for the future with newer approaches to defining uncertainty in laboratory medicine.
    Dybkaer R
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):579-83. PubMed ID: 10667703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Domestic and international trends concerning allowable limits of error in external quality assessment scheme].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 16026083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance - a plea for error grid analysis.
    Krouwer JS; Cembrowski GS
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 49(7):1127-30. PubMed ID: 21619465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical performance specifications for EQA schemes - need for harmonisation.
    Dallas Jones GR
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 May; 53(6):919-24. PubMed ID: 25883203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference.
    Panteghini M; Ceriotti F; Jones G; Oosterhuis W; Plebani M; Sandberg S;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(12):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 29031018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality specifications based on analysis of effects of performance on clinical decision-making.
    Petersen PH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 10667690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
    Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal.
    Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA.
    Thelen MHM; Jansen RTP; Weykamp CW; Steigstra H; Meijer R; Cobbaert CM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug; 55(10):1509-1516. PubMed ID: 28182577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal analytical performance for point of care testing.
    Fraser CG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 May; 307(1-2):37-43. PubMed ID: 11369335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical quality specifications for common reference intervals.
    Ricós C; Doménech MV; Perich C
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(7):858-62. PubMed ID: 15327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.
    Ricós C; Alvarez V; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):491-500. PubMed ID: 10667686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry.
    Powers DM; Greenberg N
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 10667695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.