These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10667698)

  • 1. Analytical quality, performance indices and laboratory service.
    Hilden J; Magid E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):555-8. PubMed ID: 10667698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality specifications based on analysis of effects of performance on clinical decision-making.
    Petersen PH
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):517-21. PubMed ID: 10667690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analytical performance, reference values and decision limits. A need to differentiate between reference intervals and decision limits and to define analytical quality specifications.
    Petersen PH; Jensen EA; Brandslund I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 50(5):819-31. PubMed ID: 22628319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics.
    Fraser CG
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):487-90. PubMed ID: 10667685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing.
    Lippi G; Guidi GC; Mattiuzzi C; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 16599826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postanalytical factors and their influence on analytical quality specifications.
    Goldschmidt HM
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):551-4. PubMed ID: 10667697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality indicators and specifications for the extra-analytical phases in clinical laboratory management.
    Ricós C; García-Victoria M; de la Fuente B
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004; 42(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 15259371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External quality assessment of medical laboratories in Croatia: preliminary evaluation of post-analytical laboratory testing.
    Krleza JL; Dorotic A; Grzunov A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2017 Feb; 27(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 28392737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What information on measurement uncertainty should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
    Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Bernardi D; Aita A; Antonelli G; Padoan A
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():18-22. PubMed ID: 29402416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can current analytical quality performance of UK clinical laboratories support evidence-based guidelines for diabetes and ischaemic heart disease?--A pilot study and a proposal.
    Jassam N; Yundt-Pacheco J; Jansen R; Thomas A; Barth JH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 51(8):1579-84. PubMed ID: 23525878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The ways of harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement techniques].
    Miller WG; Myers GL; Gantzer ML; Kahn SE; Schönbrunner ER; Thienpont LM; Bunk DM; Christenson RH; Eckfeldt JH; Stanley GL; Nubling CM; Sturgeon CM
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2013 Feb; (2):54-61. PubMed ID: 23808013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness.
    Sciacovelli L; Zardo L; Secchiero S; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 Jul; 333(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 12849907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Harmonization of laboratory testing - Current achievements and future strategies.
    Tate JR; Johnson R; Barth J; Panteghini M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():4-7. PubMed ID: 24001695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying the value-of-information paradigm to laboratory management.
    Hammond HC
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1996; 10(2):98-102, 104-6. PubMed ID: 10172597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a survey of current practice in the UK.
    Barth JH
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2011 May; 48(Pt 3):238-40. PubMed ID: 21367882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reprint of "Influence of analytical bias and imprecision on the number of false positive results using Guideline-Driven Medical Decision Limits".
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Klee GG
    Clin Chim Acta; 2014 May; 432():127-34. PubMed ID: 24747109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Governmental perspectives on evaluating laboratory performance.
    Boone DJ
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1461-5; discussion 1466-7. PubMed ID: 8330408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic validity as a theoretical concept and as a measurable quantity.
    Büttner J
    Clin Chim Acta; 1997 Apr; 260(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 9177909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.