These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10667998)

  • 1. Contrast and range effects for category, magnitude and labeled magnitude scales in judgements of sweetness intensity.
    Lawless HT; Horne J; Spiers W
    Chem Senses; 2000 Feb; 25(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 10667998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell.
    Green BG; Dalton P; Cowart B; Shaffer G; Rankin K; Higgins J
    Chem Senses; 1996 Jun; 21(3):323-34. PubMed ID: 8670711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.
    Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Green BG; Hoffman HJ; Ko CW; Lucchina LA; Marks LE; Snyder DJ; Weiffenbach JM
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Aug; 82(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15234598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T; Park JH; Lim J
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bitter taste of saccharin and acesulfame-K.
    Horne J; Lawless HT; Speirs W; Sposato D
    Chem Senses; 2002 Jan; 27(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 11751465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of sweetness: the effects of concentration and temperature.
    Calviño AM
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(6):1021-8. PubMed ID: 3725904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting sugar-fat mixtures: sweetness and creaminess vary with phenotypic markers of oral sensation.
    Hayes JE; Duffy VB
    Chem Senses; 2007 Mar; 32(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 17204520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of sweetness in simple and complex taste stimuli by adults and children.
    James CE; Laing DG; Oram N; Hutchinson I
    Chem Senses; 1999 Jun; 24(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 10400446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context effects in judging taste intensity: a comparison of variable line and category rating methods.
    Stillman JA
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Oct; 54(4):477-84. PubMed ID: 8255710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metrics of odorant dissimilarity. Labeled magnitude scale vs magnitude estimation.
    Kurtz DB; White TL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():638-40. PubMed ID: 9929663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confusing tastes and smells: how odours can influence the perception of sweet and sour tastes.
    Stevenson RJ; Prescott J; Boakes RA
    Chem Senses; 1999 Dec; 24(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 10587495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of temperature on the perceived sweetness of sucrose.
    Bartoshuk LM; Rennert K; Rodin J; Stevens JC
    Physiol Behav; 1982 May; 28(5):905-10. PubMed ID: 7100291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sweetness intensity enhancement by pulsatile stimulation: effects of magnitude and quality of taste contrast.
    Burseg KM; Lieu HL; Bult JH
    Chem Senses; 2012 Jan; 37(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21743095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale.
    Kalva JJ; Sims CA; Puentes LA; Snyder DJ; Bartoshuk LM
    J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S238-45. PubMed ID: 24422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the "absoluteness" of category and magnitude scales of pain.
    Ellermeier W; Westphal W; Heidenfelder M
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Feb; 49(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 2017352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect.
    Clark CC; Lawless HT
    Chem Senses; 1994 Dec; 19(6):583-94. PubMed ID: 7735838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity.
    Green BG; Alvarez-Reeves M; George P; Akirav C
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Nov; 86(4):526-37. PubMed ID: 16199067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.
    Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Hayes JE; Moskowitz HR; Snyder DJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2006 Jul; 361(1471):1137-48. PubMed ID: 16815797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of a handheld display device for an expandable labeled magnitude scale (LMS).
    Guest S; Wells M; Dancer C; Essick G
    Chem Senses; 2006 Jul; 31(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 16614137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast.
    Shepard TG; Shavit AY; Veldhuizen MG; Marks LE
    Perception; 2017; 46(3-4):268-282. PubMed ID: 28024444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.