These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1066807)

  • 1. [Reproduction of cephalometric films with a soft-tissue outline].
    Bonneau E; Benoist M
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1976; 77(3):613-6. PubMed ID: 1066807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].
    Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements.
    Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Prahl-Andersen B; Wattel E; Uljee IH
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Correlatives between soft tissues and skeletal structures of the face. Statistical study of cephalometric values (author's transl)].
    Duhart AM
    Rev Odontostomatol Midi Fr; 1979; 37(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 297255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Statistical analysis of the correlation of the soft tissue profile on the skeletal and dental elements using the Neger angle].
    Roth R; Rutz A; Schnieper R
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1981; 13(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 6946966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Morphometric correlation between facial soft-tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents.
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 17920497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gnathologic orthopedic diagnosis using Bimler cephalometric analysis.
    Howard JT
    J Am Acad Gnathol Orthop; 1990 Mar; 7(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 2373650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A cephalometric comparison of skeletal profile and soft tissue profile on adults with normal occlusion].
    Seren E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 2101666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of soft tissue profile analysis in children.
    Fields HW; Vann WF; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Apr; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 6213182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The sagittal relation of the craniofacial skeletal base as analysed by 3 cephalometric methods based respectively on angle, line and arch value].
    Miotti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983; 2(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 6583174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey.
    Aulsebrook WA; Işcan MY; Slabbert JH; Becker P
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Oct; 75(2-3):101-20. PubMed ID: 8586334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faciometrics: a new syntax for facial feature analysis.
    El-Mangoury NH; Mostafa YA; Rasmy EM; Salah A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 9046629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital imaging in the assessment of facial deformity.
    Fanibunda KB; Thomas PR
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 37(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 10371308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The stability of anatomical and centroid reference points in cephalometric analysis.
    Trenouth MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 2596750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Projecting the soft-tissue outcome of surgical and orthodontic manipulation of the maxillofacial skeleton.
    Kinnebrew MC; Hoffman DR; Carlton DM
    Am J Orthod; 1983 Dec; 84(6):508-19. PubMed ID: 6580823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roentgencephalometric standards for the facial skeleton and soft tissue profile of Swedish children and young adults. II. Comparisons with earlier Scandinavian normative data.
    Thilander B; Persson M; Skagius S
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982; 15():219-28. PubMed ID: 6963777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cephalometric analysis of Enlow's "counterparts": personal contribution and critical observations].
    Tollaro I
    Mondo Ortod; 1981; 6(2):18-29. PubMed ID: 6949027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Morphological changes in the maxillo-facial structures during orthodontic treatment. Changes in skeletal pattern, incisor axis and soft tissues and their correlations].
    Usui E; Tejima M; Aoki K; Harazaki M; Yamaguchi H; Sebata M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1985 Mar; 85(3):381-94. PubMed ID: 3860959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.